Skip to main content

Uber files LADoT lawsuit over Jump data

Uber, owner of the Jump bike-share brand, has filed a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADoT) to contest what it calls the unlawful implementation of the Mobility Data Specification (MDS).
By Ben Spencer April 1, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Uber is unhappy over what it sees as a threat to Jump riders' privacy

In a blog post on M, Uber's chief privacy officer Ruby Zefo says MDS allows the city to access and collect the location coordinates of Jump riders in real-time, putting their privacy at risk.
 
The move comes a month after Uber's decision to join the Communities Against Rider Surveillance group to raise awareness of how MDS can be used by local governments to track personal movements through a city.

Uber says Jump shares data to support safe operations of dockless mobility programmes in cities while also helping them make sure permit requirements are met.
 
“However, we remain concerned about LADoT’s demand for data about individual riders, including where they begin their trip, where and when they arrive, which route they take and any stop they make along the way,” Zefo continues. “This highly personal information, shared in real time with government agencies, signifies a decisive step towards the continuous, unregulated surveillance of our users.”
 
She bolsters Uber's stance by referring to an analysis carried out by California's Legislative Counsel Bureau which looked into whether such data could violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (Calecpa).
 
“The Calecpa restricts a department of a city or country from requiring a business that rents dockless scooters or other shared mobility devices to the public to provide the department with real-time location data from its dockless shared mobility devices as a condition of granting a permit to operate in the department's jurisdiction,” the bureau concluded.
 
Zefo emphasises that Uber supports building a data sharing standard that can serve all cities “without jeopardising privacy”.
 
“Filing this lawsuit is an unfortunate, but necessary, step towards understanding how we can build standards and policies together that facilitate the exchange of mobility data while respecting the guardrails of consumer privacy and Constitutional rights,” Zefo concludes.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ITS European Congress: safer and cleaner mobility
    August 6, 2019
    Smart mobility and the increasing digitalisation of transport were among the main themes of this year’s ITS European Congress in the Netherlands. Ben Spencer picks some highlights from conference sessions which considered possible future developments Navigating between the Evoluon conference centre - a former science museum that resembles a giant-sized UFO - and an automotive campus, there was a lot to see at the 13th ITS European Congress in Brainport, Eindhoven. Organised by Ertico – ITS Europe and th
  • With C-ITS we can get ourselves connected
    June 27, 2025
    Workzones need to be safer for drivers and workers – and the technology exists to harmonise safety with mobility needs, says Swarco’s Daniel Lenczowski
  • More thought needed on ITS privacy and data protection
    February 27, 2012
    It's long been the case that policy should drive technology and not the other way round.
  • Transition time for mobility in Hamburg
    June 11, 2025
    The City of Hamburg – host of the UITP Summit 2025 – has been working with PTV Group to make the most of technology to enhance urban mobility, and reach climate goals…