Skip to main content

Uber files LADoT lawsuit over Jump data

Uber, owner of the Jump bike-share brand, has filed a lawsuit against the Los Angeles Department of Transportation (LADoT) to contest what it calls the unlawful implementation of the Mobility Data Specification (MDS).
By Ben Spencer April 1, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Uber is unhappy over what it sees as a threat to Jump riders' privacy

In a blog post on M, Uber's chief privacy officer Ruby Zefo says MDS allows the city to access and collect the location coordinates of Jump riders in real-time, putting their privacy at risk.
 
The move comes a month after Uber's decision to join the Communities Against Rider Surveillance group to raise awareness of how MDS can be used by local governments to track personal movements through a city.

Uber says Jump shares data to support safe operations of dockless mobility programmes in cities while also helping them make sure permit requirements are met.
 
“However, we remain concerned about LADoT’s demand for data about individual riders, including where they begin their trip, where and when they arrive, which route they take and any stop they make along the way,” Zefo continues. “This highly personal information, shared in real time with government agencies, signifies a decisive step towards the continuous, unregulated surveillance of our users.”
 
She bolsters Uber's stance by referring to an analysis carried out by California's Legislative Counsel Bureau which looked into whether such data could violate the California Electronic Communications Privacy Act (Calecpa).
 
“The Calecpa restricts a department of a city or country from requiring a business that rents dockless scooters or other shared mobility devices to the public to provide the department with real-time location data from its dockless shared mobility devices as a condition of granting a permit to operate in the department's jurisdiction,” the bureau concluded.
 
Zefo emphasises that Uber supports building a data sharing standard that can serve all cities “without jeopardising privacy”.
 
“Filing this lawsuit is an unfortunate, but necessary, step towards understanding how we can build standards and policies together that facilitate the exchange of mobility data while respecting the guardrails of consumer privacy and Constitutional rights,” Zefo concludes.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Technology and finance shapes up to make MaaS happen
    June 7, 2017
    The technology and finance aspects needed for Mobility as a Service (MaaS) to become widely adopted are taking shape as Geoff Hadwick and Colin Sowman hear. Sampo Hietanen, CEO of MaaS Global and ‘father’ of MaaS, started his address to ITS International’s recent MaaS Market conference in London by saying: “All of the problems that can be solved by a company or group of companies have already been solved, and now we are left with the big ones such as housing, transport and health. He called MaaS the “Netfli
  • How to win over car owners to public transit
    February 16, 2021
    Public transportation agencies need to look at what private sector firms like Amazon and Netflix have offered their customers, argues Bonnie Crawford of Cubic Transportation Systems
  • Better liveability through more micromobility
    November 1, 2022
    Shared and micromobility offer new options, weaning urbanites off their cars, stitching existing mass transit combinations together. Andrew Stone looks at a report on transforming our cities
  • Crossing the line: managing traffic across jurisdictions
    June 18, 2024
    The US will eventually have a fully-digitised transportation network, with traffic management devices talking to each other across massive distances. It’s really a question of pain points on the road to full deployment, explains Mark Talbot of Q-Free