Skip to main content

Inclusivity 'fundamental' to transit design

ITS (UK) Inclusive Mobility Forum hears of £70bn benefit in closing 'accessibility gap'
By Adam Hill March 18, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
ITS (UK): 'Delivering inclusive mobility isn’t just the right thing to do, it makes economic sense' (image credit: Research Institute for Disabled Consumers)

Public-facing transport technology - particularly public transit - must have inclusivity factored in from the beginning, or risk excluding less able members of society.

That's the warning from ITS (UK)'s latest Inclusive Mobility Forum meeting, which heard from Gordon McCullough, CEO of the Research Institute for Disabled Consumers, that disabled people take 38% fewer trips than non-disabled people, and this accessibility gap has not changed in a decade.

McCullough said 'digital exclusion' was particularly important for transport service providers to address.

A recent survey of disabled people suggested that a quarter are unable to use smartphone and tablet apps, nearly a third struggled to evaluate the credibility of online information, one in eight find obstacles with shopping around for products and services on the Internet - and one in 10 are not confident to search for information. 

This means disabled and older people must be included from the start of any transport service design.

“It should be the most fundamental thing that you think about at the very beginning, and the way to do that is to put a process in that allows you to listen and understand disabled people's needs and expectations," McCullough said.

“Delivering inclusive mobility isn’t just the right thing to do, it makes economic sense,” said Forum Chair Kris Beuret.  

“We heard in the meeting how the annual economic benefit of closing the accessibility gap is more than £70 billion. Therefore, there is no reason whatsoever not to properly consider all sections of society when planning a transport product."

"It is clear that, if you do not consider inclusivity from the very beginning of product development, and whether you mean to or not, you will end up excluding people," Beuret added.

ITS (UK) is setting up a research project to understand more about why digital exclusion is not being addressed.

You can read more about the ITS (UK) Inclusive Mobility Forum research project here.

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Loop detection still has a part in traffic management
    March 2, 2012
    Bob Lees, co-founder of Diamond Consulting Services, on why the loop detector just refuses to go away. The more strident proponents of newer and emergent detection technologies are quick to highlight what they see as the disadvantages, and hence the imminent passing, of the humble inductive loop. The more prosaic will acknowledge that loops continue to have a part to play in traffic management, falling back on the assertion that it is all a question of application. And yet year after year the loop, despite
  • RAC report - motorists frustrated with road taxes
    June 13, 2013
    According to the RAC’s 2013 Report on Motoring, the condition of the UK’s motorways and local roads, characterised by the now year-round problem of potholes, ranks as a top concern for motorists. While the cost of driving is understandably still the number one concern for nearly half (46 per cent) of Britain’s motorists, two in five (41 per cent) say maintenance of local roads and motorways is their top spending priority. In addition, 84 per cent of motorists believe their local roads are deteriorating and
  • Nothing basic about universal basic mobility
    May 5, 2022
    The concept of universal basic mobility is here: but Shared-Use Mobility Center CEO Benjamin de la Peña tells Ben Spencer that such schemes may not be looking at the right targets
  • Jeff Price, Cubic: 'You have to embrace complexity, whilst trying to tame it'
    April 27, 2023
    Jeff Price, from Cubic Transportation Systems, explains why the ITS sector needs to put humans at the heart of innovation – and how making things simple is often difficult to do