Skip to main content

Inclusivity 'fundamental' to transit design

ITS (UK) Inclusive Mobility Forum hears of £70bn benefit in closing 'accessibility gap'
By Adam Hill March 18, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
ITS (UK): 'Delivering inclusive mobility isn’t just the right thing to do, it makes economic sense' (image credit: Research Institute for Disabled Consumers)

Public-facing transport technology - particularly public transit - must have inclusivity factored in from the beginning, or risk excluding less able members of society.

That's the warning from ITS (UK)'s latest Inclusive Mobility Forum meeting, which heard from Gordon McCullough, CEO of the Research Institute for Disabled Consumers, that disabled people take 38% fewer trips than non-disabled people, and this accessibility gap has not changed in a decade.

McCullough said 'digital exclusion' was particularly important for transport service providers to address.

A recent survey of disabled people suggested that a quarter are unable to use smartphone and tablet apps, nearly a third struggled to evaluate the credibility of online information, one in eight find obstacles with shopping around for products and services on the Internet - and one in 10 are not confident to search for information. 

This means disabled and older people must be included from the start of any transport service design.

“It should be the most fundamental thing that you think about at the very beginning, and the way to do that is to put a process in that allows you to listen and understand disabled people's needs and expectations," McCullough said.

“Delivering inclusive mobility isn’t just the right thing to do, it makes economic sense,” said Forum Chair Kris Beuret.  

“We heard in the meeting how the annual economic benefit of closing the accessibility gap is more than £70 billion. Therefore, there is no reason whatsoever not to properly consider all sections of society when planning a transport product."

"It is clear that, if you do not consider inclusivity from the very beginning of product development, and whether you mean to or not, you will end up excluding people," Beuret added.

ITS (UK) is setting up a research project to understand more about why digital exclusion is not being addressed.

You can read more about the ITS (UK) Inclusive Mobility Forum research project here.

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Sampo Hietanen’s mobility mission
    June 17, 2016
    For a decade Sampo Hietanen harboured a vision of an alternative form of mobility, now as CEO of MaaS Finland he is putting theory into practice. Sampo Hietanen has become the embodiment of Mobility as a Service (MaaS) – a concept he created 10 years ago while working for Finnish civil engineering giant Destia. “I had been working with the mobile sector on traffic information and started thinking what will happen when this becomes bigger,” he says.
  • ITS needs continuity at the policy-making level
    February 1, 2012
    ITS needs to be sold to politicians in plainer terms and we need to be encouraging greater continuity at the policy-making level says Josef Czako, chairman of the IRF's Policy Committee on ITS. At the ITS World Congress in New York in 2008, the International Road Federation (IRF) held the inaugural meeting of its Policy Committee on ITS. The Policy Committee's formation, says its chairman, Kapsch's Josef Czako, reflects an ongoing concern over the lack of deployment of ITS technology on roads in anything li
  • Jenoptik sees value in international outlook
    June 13, 2024
    Technology is always changing in the traffic management sector. Tobias Deubel of Jenoptik talks to Adam Hill about the past, the future – and the importance of global partnerships
  • Safer roads need safe systems approach, better infrastructure
    January 19, 2012
    Some developed countries are far from leading the way when it comes to making road infrastructure safe. In fact, says the Road Safety Foundation's Joanne Hill, they learn a lot from what is happening in emergent nations. A new report from the Road Safety Foundation, 'Saving Lives, Saving Money - the costs and benefits of achieving safe roads', makes some startling assertions about attitudes to road safety. Although concerned predominantly with the UK, there are some universal lessons to be learned, accordin