Skip to main content

How to make people feel safe with AVs

New research suggests that having a person available to help might be useful for acceptance
By Adam Hill December 5, 2022 Read time: 3 mins
No human involved? Might be a problem for many people (© Scharfsinn86 | Dreamstime.com)

While autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to transform the way we travel, people need to trust them and want to use them.

But D-Risk - a £3m Innovate UK-funded research project - has found that almost three in 10 people (28.5%) are still undecided about getting in one.

Factors that could help include the presence of an actual person in case of emergency and the idea of annual checks of AV software.

The collaboration between DG Cities, DRisk.ai, Claytex and Imperial College London began in November 2019 and concluded this year.

Interestingly, time of day appears to make a difference to attitudes. People are slightly more willing to ride in a self-driving vehicle during the day: less than a fifth (17.6%) believe travelling in a self-driving vehicle in an urban area or a rural environment (15.5%) at night would be safe.

But daytime travel was rated as slightly safer (urban: 24.7%, rural: 22.1%).

Trust would be improved by annual software MOTs (49.8% believed it would have a positive impact) and independent software audits (48.4%).

The most popular choice was the DVLA (Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency).

The survey and workshops highlighted that people are reassured by a human presence: access to a trained individual who could provide support in the event of an emergency was a factor.

"We’re concerned with how technology works for people," says Ed Houghton, head of research and service design, DG Cities.

“To develop safe self-driving vehicles and services, we need a deeper understanding of what safety means at an individual level. As well as passing technical safety tests, self-driving vehicles have to be trusted by the public – this is the only way to gain acceptance and enable their deployment.”

It's fair to say that advanced driver assistance features such as automated lane-keeping systems (ALKS) are viewed with some scepticism by the public,

Only a quarter (25.2%) are looking to use ALKS in the future.

More than half (59.3%) would not use ALKS technologies if they were made available.

Fewer than half (48.7%) do not believe that ALKS will improve road safety, while almost a quarter (24.6%) are yet to be convinced.

Age is a significant factor. The data highlighted that interest in using ALKS is greater for young people: 57.1% of 18–24-year-olds, 58.3%- and 25–34-year-olds. For over 75s, this fell to 10.5%.

“Most new vehicles developed over the next decades will incorporate some degree of autonomy," says Balazs Csuvar, head of delivery, DG Cities.

"This will help with safety, but people need to know when it is appropriate to use these systems and how – there also needs to be greater awareness of their limitations. Technology developers are addressing this, but users need to be part of their evolution – to design for people and real scenarios, we need to know when and how people would use ADAS, how they instinctively feel about them.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Report analyses multiple ITS projects to highlight cost and benefits
    March 16, 2015
    Every year in America cost benefit analysis is carried out on dozens of ITS installations and pilot studies and the findings, along with the lessons learned, are entered into the Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) web-based ITS Knowledge Resources database. This database holds more than 1,600 reports and periodically the USDOT reviews the material on file to draw conclusions from this wider body of evidence. It has just published one such review ITS Benefits, Costs, and Lessons Learned: 2014 Update Re
  • Independence and mobility key for older drivers, IAM report finds
    February 18, 2016
    The majority of older drivers want to continue driving as long as they are safely able, according to a survey commissioned by the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM), citing independence and convenience as the main reasons. The report, Keeping Older Drivers Safe and Mobile, surveyed more than 2,600 drivers and ex-drivers between the ages of 55 and 101 and was written by Dr Carol Hawley from the University of Warwick Medical School. Although the report found 84 per cent of driver respondents rated th
  • Transportation guru sceptical about V2V technology
    September 12, 2014
    Robert Poole, co-founder of the Reason Foundation, has worked on transportation policy for more than three decades and is an influential voice on tolling, congestion pricing and infrastructure finance. Writing in his monthly newsletter (link http://reason.org/news/show/surface-transportation-news-131) he voices his scepticism of vehicle to vehicle (V2V) and vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) technology which may one day allow cars to communicate with each other and with traffic infrastructure to avoid colli
  • Hayden AI’s Renee Autumn Ray: ‘It’s about problem solving’
    December 6, 2022
    Renee Autumn Ray is senior director of global strategy for Hayden AI. She has also admitted to impostor syndrome, has no time for people who scorn the public sector and offers one simple rule about social media. Adam Hill meets her to find out what that is, among other things