Skip to main content

How to make people feel safe with AVs

New research suggests that having a person available to help might be useful for acceptance
By Adam Hill December 5, 2022 Read time: 3 mins
No human involved? Might be a problem for many people (© Scharfsinn86 | Dreamstime.com)

While autonomous vehicles (AVs) have the potential to transform the way we travel, people need to trust them and want to use them.

But D-Risk - a £3m Innovate UK-funded research project - has found that almost three in 10 people (28.5%) are still undecided about getting in one.

Factors that could help include the presence of an actual person in case of emergency and the idea of annual checks of AV software.

The collaboration between DG Cities, DRisk.ai, Claytex and Imperial College London began in November 2019 and concluded this year.

Interestingly, time of day appears to make a difference to attitudes. People are slightly more willing to ride in a self-driving vehicle during the day: less than a fifth (17.6%) believe travelling in a self-driving vehicle in an urban area or a rural environment (15.5%) at night would be safe.

But daytime travel was rated as slightly safer (urban: 24.7%, rural: 22.1%).

Trust would be improved by annual software MOTs (49.8% believed it would have a positive impact) and independent software audits (48.4%).

The most popular choice was the DVLA (Driver & Vehicle Licensing Agency).

The survey and workshops highlighted that people are reassured by a human presence: access to a trained individual who could provide support in the event of an emergency was a factor.

"We’re concerned with how technology works for people," says Ed Houghton, head of research and service design, DG Cities.

“To develop safe self-driving vehicles and services, we need a deeper understanding of what safety means at an individual level. As well as passing technical safety tests, self-driving vehicles have to be trusted by the public – this is the only way to gain acceptance and enable their deployment.”

It's fair to say that advanced driver assistance features such as automated lane-keeping systems (ALKS) are viewed with some scepticism by the public,

Only a quarter (25.2%) are looking to use ALKS in the future.

More than half (59.3%) would not use ALKS technologies if they were made available.

Fewer than half (48.7%) do not believe that ALKS will improve road safety, while almost a quarter (24.6%) are yet to be convinced.

Age is a significant factor. The data highlighted that interest in using ALKS is greater for young people: 57.1% of 18–24-year-olds, 58.3%- and 25–34-year-olds. For over 75s, this fell to 10.5%.

“Most new vehicles developed over the next decades will incorporate some degree of autonomy," says Balazs Csuvar, head of delivery, DG Cities.

"This will help with safety, but people need to know when it is appropriate to use these systems and how – there also needs to be greater awareness of their limitations. Technology developers are addressing this, but users need to be part of their evolution – to design for people and real scenarios, we need to know when and how people would use ADAS, how they instinctively feel about them.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • IBTTA summit hits right notes in Salzburg
    December 5, 2018
    In the birthplace of Mozart, Colin Sowman found that delegates at the IBTTA’s inaugural World Tolling Summit were playing a variety of interesting tunes The first World Tolling Summit took place in Salzburg, Austria this autumn. Created and organised by the International Bridge Tolling and Turnpike Association (IBTTA), the event was supported by its European counterpart Asecap and hosted by Austria’s tolling authority, Asfinag. The transfer of views, experience and practice both ways across the Atl
  • Regulating rural road use
    June 20, 2016
    David Crawford looks at problems facing indigenous communities and those unfamiliar with driving in rural areas. While it is well known that the fatality rate for road crashes in rural areas is higher than in towns and cities, some groups suffer far more than others. For instance, the rates of death and serious injury from vehicle accidents is much higher for American Indian and Alaska Native (AI and AN) populations living in rural tribal lands than for any of the country’s other ethnic populations. Crashes
  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
  • Chancellor announces measures to support Liverpool’s science and transport
    July 3, 2014
    UK Chancellor of the Exchequer, the Rt. Hon George Osborne will visit Liverpool today to announce a package of measures to support the city’s science and transport infrastructure. The Chancellor will unveil a new US$60 million transport package as part of the Atlantic Gateway project, which is building greater connections between Liverpool and Manchester and aims to create 250,000 jobs by 2030.