Skip to main content

Weigh in motion helps Caltrans minimise road damage

Colin Sowman finds out why California is still expanding its already comprehensive weigh-in-motion (WIM) system. California has the most complete weigh-in-motion (WIM) system in the United States and recently announced a US$1.6 million contract for another Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility (usually called a weigh station) near Mountain Pass. According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the aim is not to persecute offenders but to track vehicle weights in order to prevent or
March 19, 2014 Read time: 4 mins
Computerised illustration of the forthcoming commercial vehicle enforcement facility near Mountain Pass
Colin Sowman finds out why California is still expanding its already comprehensive weigh-in-motion (WIM) system.

California has the most complete weigh-in-motion (WIM) system in the United States and recently announced a US$1.6 million contract for another Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Facility (usually called a weigh station) near Mountain Pass. According to the 923 California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the aim is not to persecute offenders but to track vehicle weights in order to prevent or minimise road damage.

It has been calculated that a 10% axle overload results in a 40% increase in road damage, so even relatively minor overloading can have a major impact on a road’s service life.

Most, although not all, of the WIM installations are situated in more than 125 weigh stations spread across the state and operated by the 1855 California Highway Patrol. The majority of weigh stations are classified as mini-sites and many of the enforcement facilities are not manned for much of the time. When the enforcement facilities are unmanned, their WIM systems (along with those not in weigh stations) are used to collect data for census rather than enforcement purposes. However, according to the California Highway Patrol, when the stations are open ‘weight/loading violations are observed on a regular basis’.
Californian legislation requires drivers of all commercial vehicles, including pick-up trucks more than than 5.2tonnes (11,500lb) to stop for a weigh check when directed to do so. Failing to stop and submit a vehicle to size, weight, equipment and smoke emissions testing is an actionable misdemeanour. The result is that the number of trucks that have to be processed can be high and a rapid method of checking weights and identifying potential offenders is required if unacceptable delays are to be avoided.

In practice, unless a truck is registered in the Prepass scheme (see ITS International Sept/Oct 2013) it is likely to be diverted off the highway into an open weigh station. The WIM system is used to rapidly check vehicles and identify potential offenders while minimising the delay for vehicles operating legally within the weight limit.

Typically the WIM equipment Caltrans specifies can operate on vehicles travelling between eight and 160km/h (five and 100mph) and has an accuracy of ± 5% but may not be calibrated to enforcement standards. Vehicles identified for suspected overload of one or more axles by the WIM system are directed to a calibrated static weighbridge for enforcement purposes.

The recently-announced installation near Mountain Pass, a port of entry from neighbouring Nevada, will have sixteen single load cell scales from 69 International Road Dynamics (IRD) in a double-threshold configuration. It will consist of two full lane-width WIM scales at the advance, sorter and slow-speed ramp locations. An image-capture camera system allows enforcement personnel to track vehicles moving through the weigh station and IRD will also supply a static scale system to weigh trucks suspected of being overweight.
The US$1.6 million one-off cost for the new weigh station has to be set against the US$1.3 billion California spent on road maintenance schemes in the 2010/11 financial year - and the trajectory is upward. The funds were used to repair 6,200 lane miles of road, 83% of which were national highway routes. Caltrans says particular areas, typically near logging routes, quarries and ports, do have a higher average truck weight and possibly more overweight trucks.  There are also areas that are known to not have a weigh station facility.

A 2005 study, by the Pavement Research Center, part of the Institute of Transportation Studies at the 3880 University of California, found that 2.67% of axles crossing WIM sites were overweight. The average overload was more than 5% while the worst offender was some 19% over the permitted axle weight.  

In the study the weight of each axle passing over a WIM sensor was converted into an equivalent single axle load (ESAL) as an indicator of expected average road damage. This allows different axle types (single, tandem, tridem) to be directly summed together and is directly related to the Traffic Index used by Caltrans in road design. The service life of a road is inversely proportional to the number of ESALs carried and an important feature of the ESAL function is that it is exponentially proportional to the weight of the axle. So a 50% increase in load on a tandem axle is equal to 450% more ESALs and in an overload situation this will impose substantially greater road damage.

Assuming two overloaded axles per overweight vehicle, between 1% and 2% of trucks are overloaded so the cost of enforcement may appear high but those vehicles cause a disproportionate amount of road damage; diminishing returns it is not.


Selected single, tandem and tridem weights with equivalent single axle loads (ESALs) by axle type

Load and ESALs by Axle Type
 Single, Steering
   Tandem    Tridem  
 Weight (kN)
 ESALs  Weight (kN)  ESALs
 Weight (kN)  ESALs
 75  0.76  130  0.84  200  1.39
 80  1.00  140  1.14  215  1.89
 85  1.29  150  1.53  230  2.51
 90
 1.64
 160  2.00  245  3.27
 95  2.06  170  2.58  260  4.20
 100  2.55  180  3.28  275  5.31
Note: weight and ESALs in italics indicate loads above the legal limit.

Related Content

  • Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    November 28, 2012
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions
  • ITS in the Baltic States: on the rise
    August 12, 2020
    In the Baltic states, on north-east Europe’s border with Russia, the ITS sector is on the verge of big growth, finds Eugene Gerden - but more
  • Can AV mapping rely on crowds?
    June 29, 2021
    Mapping tech companies need to expand their data inputs beyond crowdsourcing in order to maintain temporally accurate maps at scale, says Ro Gupta at Carmera
  • Wireless traffic data in real time
    January 31, 2012
    The effect of moving objects on the electromagnetic landscape set up by cellular telephony networks can be detected and interpreted to give real-time traffic data across large geographical areas at low cost. Here, we revisit the Celldar concept. Global economic downturn has pushed public-sector agencies, transport administrations among them, to push even harder for cost efficiencies. Unfortunately, when it comes to transport safety and efficiency the public sector often has to work up to a cost rather than