Skip to main content

Green Light WIM

Beginning in the 1990s, Oregon was one of the first US states to use weigh-in-motion scales and transponder-based systems to enable trucks to avoid having to stop at weigh stations. Its Green Light preclearance system soon became a model for similar deployments throughout the country. Today, Green Light annually weighs and screens 1.6 million trucks as they approach 21 Oregon weigh stations and it preclears 1.5 million of them.
July 30, 2012 Read time: 4 mins
Preclearance systems use single load cell weigh-in-motion scales and dedicated short-range communication transponders to weigh and identify trucks at freeway speed as they approach a weigh station.
RSSBeginning in the 1990s, Oregon was one of the first US states to use weigh-in-motion scales and transponder-based systems to enable trucks to avoid having to stop at weigh stations. Its Green Light preclearance system soon became a model for similar deployments throughout the country. Today, Green Light annually weighs and screens 1.6 million trucks as they approach 21 Oregon weigh stations and it preclears 1.5 million of them.

It's apparent that a preclearance system like Green Light benefits truckers as, obviously, it's a waste of time and money for them to stop at weigh stations. The State of Oregon and its regulators clearly benefit, too, because as more trucks are screened and kept on the mainline, weigh station operators have more time for trucks likely to have a size, weight or safety problem. Preclearance even yields obvious global benefits by reducing greenhouse gases.

While all that's apparent, Oregon has actually quantified the gains realised through Green Light.

Project:
Green Light Weigh Station Preclearance System - Oregon

Cost:
$25 million (initial capital cost) for 21 systems

ROI:
$14.7 million in truck operating costs, over $600,000 in fuel savings and 125,000 hours of travel time saved per year

Benefits:
Additional 1.5 million trucks annually weighed, screened and signalled to go past weigh stations
Less particulate matter (0.5 tons), less hydrocarbons (1 ton), less carbon monoxide (2.4 tons), less nitrogen oxides (8 tons), and less carbon dioxide (1,300 metric tons) emitted by trucks each year.

Savings for truckers

In 2004, the American Trucking Associations examined the fixed costs of operating a heavy truck and found it amounts to $2.80 per mile. That includes 0.551 for driver wages, 0.804 for other wages and benefits, 0.198 for fuel, and 0.651 in equipment rents and purchased transportation. Based on their estimate that trucks average 42mph from point of origin to delivery, the $2.80 per mile cost is equivalent to $1.96 per minute. That means if a truck spends five minutes stopping at a weigh station, Green Light saves truckers $14.7 million in operating costs and 125,000 hours of travel time when it enables them to avoid 1.5 million stops.

Savings for the state

Preclearance systems boost a weigh station's capacity without physically expanding the facility. Were it not for Green Light, 10 Oregon stations would need to extend off-ramps and add static scales at a cost of over $2 million per site. Another five stations would become obsolete because there's no room to expand them. Instead of those sizeable costs, Oregon maintains its preclearance systems for $150,000 per year, plus the cost of parts.

Green Light protects the public's investment in roads and bridges. Overweight trucks annually cause an estimated $670 million in pavement damage to the US's highways. Oregon State University researchers estimate that Green Light saves Oregon $20 million a year.

Global savings

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality tests show that trucks are far less polluting and far more fuel efficient when they don't stop at weigh stations. There's a 36-67 per cent reduction in pollutants and a 57 per cent increase in fuel economy when trucks avoid decelerating and accelerating to enter and exit
a station.

Because Green Light annually allows 1.5 million trucks to avoid weigh station stops, Oregon skies are subjected to 0.5 tons less particulate matter, 1 ton less hydrocarbons, 2.4 tons less carbon monoxide, 8 tons less nitrogen oxides, and 1,300 metric tons less carbon dioxide. All this, plus over $600,000 in fuel savings.

Oregon size and weight enforcement

With 87 weigh stations, including six Ports of Entry and dozens of sites for portable weighing operations, Oregon annually weighs over 2 million trucks on static scales and another 1.5 million on Green Light weigh-in-motion scales. This size and weight enforcement effort protects the transportation infrastructure while assisting in collection of the state's weight-mile tax. Auditors use records of when trucks crossed scales to verify highway-use tax reports. The weight and distance tax applies to all trucks over 26,000lbs. They pay no fuel tax for travel in Oregon. The leadership taken by Oregon DOT to work in partnership with IRD (69 International Road Dynamics) to develop and deploy the Green Light Programme has resulted in a world-class weight enforcement system which considers environmental needs and financial savings to the trucking industry. IRD has also provided similar systems to highway departments in over 28 US states, including Georgia, Wisconsin, Illinois, Washington State, Hawaii and Alaska; and also globally, including systems on highways in India, South America, Thailand, Botswana, Saudi Arabia and others.


RSS

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Infrastructure and the autonomous vehicle
    December 12, 2014
    Harold Worrall ponders the effect of autonomous vehicles on transportation infrastructure. For the last century the transportation industry has been focused on the supply of infrastructure to support the ever growing fleet of vehicles and the greater number of miles covered by each vehicle. Our focus has been planning, funding, designing, building and maintaining roadways. Politicians, engineers, planners, financial managers … all of us have had this focus. We have experienced demand growth since the first
  • Infrastructure funding and road user charging – debate continues
    February 1, 2012
    Jack Opiola provides an overview of the ongoing debate over US infrastructure funding and the progress – or lack of it – towards vehicles miles travelled road user charging. The future funding of transportation and mobility infrastructure is attracting increased attention. There has been sharp debate in the US, where landmark reports from the National Surface Transportation Infrastructure Financing Commission and the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission both stated that the cu
  • Smart Spanish city trials cell-based traffic management
    November 7, 2013
    David Crawford reports on an urban electronic nervous system. The northern Spanish city of Santander – historically a port - is now an emerging technology showcase attracting global attention as a prototype for a medium-sized smart city of the future. In a move to determine the optimal use of available data, it is creating a de-facto experimental laboratory for sensor and mobile phone-based urban traffic management and environmental monitoring innovations.
  • IBTTA commends new report on infrastructure planning
    October 3, 2014
    The International Bridge, Tunnel and Turnpike Association (IBTTA) has responded to the joint report by the Eno Center for Transportation and the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), which highlights the benefits of life cycle cost analysis in planning transportation infrastructure projects. Executive director and CEO Pa trick D. Jones said: “We commend ENO and ASCE for issuing an important report, Maximizing the Value of Investments Using Life Cycle Cost Analysis. This report is especially timely