Skip to main content

UK organisations disagree on smart motorway ‘dangers’

A spat over how dangerous the UK’s all lane running (ALR) or ‘smart’ motorways are has broken out between Highways England and a leading motoring organisation. Smart motorways do not have hard shoulders, instead relying on emergency areas at intervals to provide refuge for stranded motorists. The AA recently highlighted Stationary Vehicle Detection, a Highways England report published in March 2016, which looks at how long it takes to identify a vehicle broken down in a live lane of smart motorway when s
September 13, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

A spat over how dangerous the UK’s all lane running (ALR) or ‘smart’ motorways are has broken out between 8101 Highways England and a leading motoring organisation.

Smart motorways do not have hard shoulders, instead relying on emergency areas at intervals to provide refuge for stranded motorists.

The AA recently highlighted Stationary Vehicle Detection, a Highways England report published in March 2016, which looks at how long it takes to identify a vehicle broken down in a live lane of smart motorway when stationery vehicle detection (SVD) systems are not in place.

AA says Highways England’s analysis suggests that “stopping in a live lane of an ALR motorway more than triples the danger when compared to a traditional motorway with a continuous hard shoulder”.

Using a Freedom of Information request, the AA says it found only 24.2 miles of England’s 135.1 miles of ALR are covered by SVD technology. Highways England, the government agency which oversees England’s major roads, insists that it plans to roll out more SVD and that all ALR motorways have full CCTV coverage of the “mainline carriageway”.

But AA president Edmund King counters: “This is a truly shocking revelation and shows just how dangerous it can be breaking down in a live lane. This highlights why growing numbers of the public are justified in their safety concerns over the removal of the hard shoulder

However, speaking at a conference, Highways England chief executive Jim O’Sullivan was %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external quoted false https://www.transport-network.co.uk/OSullivan-hits-back-at-smart-motorway-critics/16152 false false%> by Transport Network as saying: “I do find it hard to understand the gap between what we have done on smart motorways to make them safe and keep them safe and the perception that they aren’t safe that is often expressed in the newspapers and by some of the motoring organisations.”

O’Sullivan says there is no difference between accident rates on smart and conventional motorways.

The widow of a driver killed this year on a smart motorway has already announced she is to bring a case of corporate manslaughter against Highways England. Separately, the organisation announced this week that it is to offer rescue and roadside recovery services a new training course to help them work safely on smart motorways.

Related Content

  • August 6, 2018
    Bristol advances towards 2050 emissions target
    Bristol City Council will install 120 electric vehicle (EV) charge points and convert part of its fleet to electric in a bid to become carbon neutral by 2050. The UK council also intends to transition at least 10% of its vehicles to electric by 2021. The scheme will take place across the West of England and is being funded by £2m grant provided by the Office of Low Emission Vehicles (OLEV) through the Go Ultra Low West project. Go Ultra Low West’s stated aim is to provide the infrastructure and enviro
  • March 26, 2014
    Icoms Detections offers radar stop-line detection
    Icoms Detections has added an easy-to-use radar for the detection of stationary vehicles at the stop-line to its I-tersection range. A vehicle approaching or stopping in the targeted activates a relay loop, which is held until the vehicle moves. The advantage over inductive loop technology is the absence of the need for roadworks for installation. The sensor also provides warning of whether vehicles fail to start as expected, because of congestion, obstruction, driver inattention and so on. At this year’s s
  • May 22, 2018
    San Francisco’s Golden Gate Bridge toll increases 25 cents
    Motorists travelling over San Francisco's Golden Gate Bridge are set to pay an extra 25 cents per trip from 1 July. According to a report by Marin Independent Journal: “The onslaught of toll increases at the Golden Gate Bridge is not likely to subside as span authorities face looming budget deficits.” The bridge board will need to decide if more toll hikes are needed in a discussion scheduled for this autumn.
  • July 8, 2019
    Cost benefit: Wichita eases workzone congestion
    Achieving higher diversion rates has helped one Kansas city to make traffic flow more efficient around workzones. David Crawford examines what’s behind a 10:1 benefit-to-cost ratio in Wichita Around 10% of highway congestion in the US results from delays in workzones, leading to an estimated annual loss of $700 million in fuel costs alone. The lack of accessible real-time traffic information to help motorists minimise their inconvenience – particularly at peak times - is a major contributor. One solut