Skip to main content

Uber AV driver charged with 'negligent homicide'

Rafael Vasquez pleads not guilty in collision which killed pedestrian Elaine Herzberg
By Adam Hill September 17, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Emergency braking system in Volvo had been disabled in fatal Tempe collision (© Andreistanescu | Dreamstime.com)

The safety driver who was in an Uber autonomous vehicle (AV) which killed a pedestrian in Arizona in 2018 has been charged with negligent homicide.

Pedestrian Elaine Herzberg was knocked down while crossing the road in Tempe, Arizona.

The Maricopa County Grand Jury in Arizona has charged Rafael Vasquez with one count of negligent homicide for the death.

Vasquez has pleaded not guilty. 

“Distracted driving is an issue of great importance in our community,” said county attourney Allister Adel. 

“When a driver gets behind the wheel of a car, they have a responsibility to control and operate that vehicle safely and in a law-abiding manner.”

An initial pre-trial conference has been set for 27 October.

Following the fatal incident, a report from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that the emergency braking function of the Volvo XC90 had been disabled at the time.

It said the car was “operating with a self-driving system in computer control mode” when it struck Herzberg, who was pushing a bicycle across the road. 

According to the NTSB report, Uber said “emergency braking manoeuvres are not enabled while the vehicle is under computer control, to reduce the potential for erratic vehicle behaviour”.

This means that the driver is relied upon to take appropriate action on the road – however, the system “is not designed to alert the operator”.

Investigators found that the car’s self-driving system registered the pedestrian about six seconds before impact, when the vehicle was travelling at 43mph. 

The system’s software classified the pedestrian “as an unknown object, as a vehicle, and then as a bicycle with varying expectations of future travel path”. 

At 1.3 seconds before impact, “the self-driving system determined that an emergency braking manoeuvre was needed to mitigate a collision”.

Following the death, Uber suspended AV testing and reviewed Uber Advanced Technologies Group’s safety approaches, system development and culture.

It said it had equipped all self-driving vehicles with a third-party driver monitoring system and improved system latency to detect objects and actors sooner and react faster.

Related Content

  • July 31, 2018
    Drive.ai self-driving tests with passengers in Frisco, Texas
    Drive.ai is using self-driving vans to carry passengers on a near two-mile route in Frisco, Texas. According to a report by CBS News, the company is the first to launch such a test since an Uber vehicle driving in autonomous mode killed a pedestrian in Arizona. These vans will operate over the next six months, with a safety driver on board, and will travel between an office park and a nearby dining area and entertainment complex. Conway Chen, vice president at Drive.ai, says the service has been desi
  • April 8, 2021
    Audi C-V2X tech to improve school safety
    Georgia deployment to gain insight over distance needed around school zones and buses
  • February 20, 2015
    Volvo testing smart cars that share road conditions
    As the Drive Me project enters its second year, Volvo Cars is moving rapidly towards the aim of placing 100 self-driving cars in the hands of customers on selected roads around Gothenburg by 2017. The key to making this unprecedented leap is a complex network of sensors, cloud-based positioning systems and intelligent braking and steering technologies. Volvo Cars’ Autopilot system is designed to be reliable enough to allow the car to take over every aspect of driving in autonomous mode. The main challenge i
  • February 1, 2021
    Mcity offers cloud C/AV solution to ACM
    OS has been integrated at research group's smart mobility test centre in Michigan