Skip to main content

Uber AV driver charged with 'negligent homicide'

Rafael Vasquez pleads not guilty in collision which killed pedestrian Elaine Herzberg
By Adam Hill September 17, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Emergency braking system in Volvo had been disabled in fatal Tempe collision (© Andreistanescu | Dreamstime.com)

The safety driver who was in an Uber autonomous vehicle (AV) which killed a pedestrian in Arizona in 2018 has been charged with negligent homicide.

Pedestrian Elaine Herzberg was knocked down while crossing the road in Tempe, Arizona.

The Maricopa County Grand Jury in Arizona has charged Rafael Vasquez with one count of negligent homicide for the death.

Vasquez has pleaded not guilty. 

“Distracted driving is an issue of great importance in our community,” said county attourney Allister Adel. 

“When a driver gets behind the wheel of a car, they have a responsibility to control and operate that vehicle safely and in a law-abiding manner.”

An initial pre-trial conference has been set for 27 October.

Following the fatal incident, a report from the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) found that the emergency braking function of the Volvo XC90 had been disabled at the time.

It said the car was “operating with a self-driving system in computer control mode” when it struck Herzberg, who was pushing a bicycle across the road. 

According to the NTSB report, Uber said “emergency braking manoeuvres are not enabled while the vehicle is under computer control, to reduce the potential for erratic vehicle behaviour”.

This means that the driver is relied upon to take appropriate action on the road – however, the system “is not designed to alert the operator”.

Investigators found that the car’s self-driving system registered the pedestrian about six seconds before impact, when the vehicle was travelling at 43mph. 

The system’s software classified the pedestrian “as an unknown object, as a vehicle, and then as a bicycle with varying expectations of future travel path”. 

At 1.3 seconds before impact, “the self-driving system determined that an emergency braking manoeuvre was needed to mitigate a collision”.

Following the death, Uber suspended AV testing and reviewed Uber Advanced Technologies Group’s safety approaches, system development and culture.

It said it had equipped all self-driving vehicles with a third-party driver monitoring system and improved system latency to detect objects and actors sooner and react faster.

Related Content

  • April 28, 2021
    Volvo helps realise DiDi AV plans
    Combined tech will eventually allow autonomous vehicles to operate without safety drivers 
  • March 20, 2018
    Uber’s autonomous taxi kills pedestrian, North American trials suspended
    An autonomous car operated by Uber has killed a pedestrian in what is believed to be the first death of its kind, in a report by The Independent. The vehicle, according to Tempe Police, was driving in autonomous mode as part of the company’s North America tests that included an operator behind the wheel that was not in control at the time of the incident. Uber Technologies has suspended all of its driverless car tests in Phoenix and Arizona as well as Pittsburgh, San Francisco and Toronto.
  • November 1, 2023
    Waymo and Uber begin Phoenix AV service
    Ride-hail users can still hire Waymo AVs through Waymo One app as well
  • November 12, 2015
    Driver aids make inroads on improving safety
    In-vehicle anti-collision systems continue to evolve and could eliminate some incidents altogether. John Kendall rounds up the current developments. A few weeks ago, I watched a driver reverse a car from a parking bay at right angles to the road, straight into a car driving along the road. The accident happened at walking pace, no-one was hurt and both cars had body panels that regain their shape after a low speed shunt.