Skip to main content

Survey: public transport operators look to expand use of real time surveillance

A survey conducted by the International Association of Public Transport (UITP) and network video supplier Axis Communications has revealed that operators worldwide are continuing to invest in leading edge security technology, with the majority interested in adopting more widespread use of real-time surveillance and advanced video analytics to better protect their passengers, equipment and installations.
June 12, 2015 Read time: 3 mins

A survey conducted by the 3833 International Association of Public Transport (UITP) and network video supplier Axis Communications has revealed that operators worldwide are continuing to invest in leading edge security technology, with the majority interested in adopting more widespread use of real-time surveillance and advanced video analytics to better protect their passengers, equipment and installations.

The majority of survey respondents have already installed security cameras, indicating not only a very strong installed base but also that public transport operators are convinced of the value that video surveillance offers their organisations. The vast majority of respondents reported that video surveillance systems help increase the actual and perceived security among passengers and staff, as well as minimise, deter and manage various types of crime and vandalism.

The survey also revealed that public transport staff is generally very positive towards the use of video surveillance, with more than 83 per cent indicating positive or neutral reactions, especially when usage of the system is well communicated to staff. Some responders do not gather staff or passenger feedback, but from those that do, no responder reported a negative reaction from staff or passengers.

The survey found that use of video surveillance within public transport is no longer only a matter of incident evidence, even if the vast majority of respondents find this forensic element the most valuable concrete use. Real-time detection of incidents also scored highly in terms of potential value, indicating this is a trend to come.

Already today, 42 per cent of respondents can share live video with other parties such as police or other authorities, and 50 per cent plus plan on using real-time video surveillance in rolling stock (moving vehicles versus just in static locations). This underlines the value of real-time video surveillance monitoring across all areas of a public transport system.

The survey also evaluated awareness, present usage and future interest in video analytics. The majority of respondents are aware of video detection analytics for intrusion, perimeter breach, fire and smoke and rail track access, with actual usage already between 10-20 per cent. Future interest is high with approximately half of the respondents having indicated that they are interested in using these video analytics applications moving forward. Graffiti behaviour detection was a further application which sparked the interest of over half the respondents.

“The survey results show that many public transport operators utilise video surveillance for more than just recorded evidence after incidents have occurred. The real-time possibilities offered by modern IP video systems are increasingly being used to efficiently manage incidents as and when they occur,” said Patrik Anderson, director Business Development Transportation, 2215 Axis Communications. “There is also more and more awareness for video analytics and how this can support daily operations to increase safety and security for both passengers and staff.”

“Ensuring citizens around the world get to school or work safely every day is the number one priority for the public transport industry. Video surveillance is a key tool to support staff and help public transport operators achieve this aim,” said Alain Flausch, secretary general, UITP.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Road user charging – change the name to change public perceptions
    February 2, 2012
    Jack Opiola explores the oft-underestimated effect that a charging scheme's name can have on public acceptability and ultimate success. The Bard of Avon wrote: "What's in a name?" For transport, especially Road User Charging, that is an especially relevant question.
  • UITP welcomes historic climate deal ‘but the real work starts now’
    December 16, 2015
    The International Association of Public Transport, UITP, has welcomed the landmark climate agreement made in Paris at the weekend but reminds governments that more must be done to bridge the emissions gap. The agreement was made by 195 nations, with, for the first time, all nations committing to a common cause on climate action based on their historic, current and future responsibilities. According to UITP, despite the landmark deal, the promises given by countries to curb their emissions in the run-u
  • How on-board video systems can increase vehicle & road safety
    January 7, 2022
    Hikvision examines technology which can avert danger in cars, school buses, taxis and trucks
  • Survey outlines predictions for public transport by 2025
    January 22, 2016
    A new survey from Xerox underscores the desire for self-driving cars and smart digital services like integrated apps and cashless payment by Europe’s Generation Z (those aged 18-24 years old). The study was conducted by TNS on behalf of Xerox between 5 and 26 October 2015 among 1,200 respondents in 12 cities across the UK, France, Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands. It revealed that by 2025, a third (32 per cent) of 18-24 year olds expect to be using self-driving cars, four in ten (41 per cent) say they w