Skip to main content

'Phantom’ menace endangers AV passengers, says study 

Projecting a ‘phantom’ image on the road can cause a semi-autonomous vehicle to brake suddenly and endanger passengers, according to a new study. 
By Ben Spencer February 20, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
BGU demonstrates how a phantom image can put passengers in an AV in danger (Source: © Haiyin | Dreamstime.com)

Researchers at Israel’s Ben Gurion University (BGU) say this is because advanced driver assistance systems (ADAS) in semi- or fully-autonomous vehicles (AVs) consider these depthless projections as real objects. 

PhD student Ben Nassi says: “This is not a bug. This is not the result of poor code implementation. This is a fundamental flaw in object detectors that essentially use feature matching for detecting visual objects and were not trained to distinguish between real and fake objects. This type of attack is currently not taken into consideration by the automobile industry.”

The ‘Phantom of the ADAS’ project also showed that attackers can fool a driving assistance system into believing fake road signs are real by distinguishing phantoms for 125 milliseconds in advertisements presented on digital billboards near roads.

He says a shortage of vehicular communication systems which connect cars to each other and the surrounding infrastructure is creating a “validation gap”, which prevents AVs from validating their virtual perception with a third party. 

More alarmingly, Nassi warns that remote attacks do not need to be carried out by skilled hackers who exploit the validation gap as the project demonstrated how such an attack can be carried out by projecting a phantom road sign from a drone. 

BGU researchers are now developing a convolutional neural network model that analyses a detected object’s contextual, surface and reflected light, which is capable of detecting phantoms with high accuracy.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
  • Weighing up the future with AI
    April 14, 2022
    There is broad agreement that artificial intelligence will be an important part of Weigh in Motion as we go forward – but Adam Hill finds that not everyone agrees quite how close we are to that point
  • Driverless Russia: Look – no hands!
    March 26, 2020
    Russia is betting on the importance of driverless cars as the country’s transport system develops in the years to come.
  • Don’t forget security threat, says Econolite
    May 6, 2020
    A new level of communication is helping deliver on the promise of Vision Zero and a more sustainable future. But amid the promise, Econolite’s Sunny Chakravarty suggests we need to be mindful of the potential downsides in an age of mass connectivity