Skip to main content

New CCTV code of practice comes into force

The UK Home Office has introduced a new code of practice for the use of surveillance cameras in England and Wales which states that CCTV cameras should be used to protect and support people, not to spy on them. The code says “The purpose of the code will be to ensure that individuals and wider communities have confidence that surveillance cameras are deployed to protect and support them, rather than spy on them.” The Home Office developed the code “to address concerns over the potential for abuse or misuse
August 12, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The UK Home Office has introduced a new code of practice for the use of surveillance cameras in England and Wales which states that CCTV cameras should be used to protect and support people, not to spy on them.

The code says “The purpose of the code will be to ensure that individuals and wider communities have confidence that surveillance cameras are deployed to protect and support them, rather than spy on them.”

The Home Office developed the code “to address concerns over the potential for abuse or misuse of surveillance by the state in public places”, stating that the government fully supports the use of overt surveillance cameras when the use is “in pursuit of a legitimate aim”, is “necessary to meet a pressing need” and “compliant with any relevant legal obligations”.

The code covers civil parking and bus lane enforcement, saying that the primary purpose of surveillance cameras as part of civil enforcement arrangements “must be the safe and efficient operation of the road network by deterring motorists from contravening parking or road traffic restrictions.”

The code of practice also restricts access to and retention of data, and encourages both public bodies and private operators to apply the code.

The code applies to CCTV and automatic number plate recognition systems.

Related Content

  • Will the European Electronic Tolling System serve its purpose?
    February 3, 2012
    ASECAP's Kallistratos Dionelis asks whether, despite the best intentions at the policy level, the European Electronic Tolling System can ever hope to serve the customer in the way it is intended to. Reality doesn't just happen. In many ways, reality is created. We first create or produce a reality and then we consume it; this takes time and has a cost that needs to be covered.
  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • Atkins Jacobs joint venture on pollution brings the noise
    November 7, 2023
    'Noise cameras' will identify vehicles which rev excessively or have illegal exhausts
  • Jenoptik supplies sophisticated multi-section control project
    November 17, 2014
    Efficient speed enforcement in the most highly frequented tunnel in Austria on the A7 near Linz. The Bindermichl-Niedernhart tunnel complex on Austrian highway A7 connects the major east/west A1 route from Vienna/ Bratislava to Munich/Salzburg with the A7/ E55 running south from Prague in the Czech Republic. This happens right in the middle of the city of Linz, Austria.