Skip to main content

Hella showcases solutions to advance autonomous driving

To enable higher levels of autonomous driving and allow OEMs and drivers the freedom to create more customized vehicles, Hella is showcasing its multifunctional sensor at the North American International Auto show 2018, in Detroit. The solution comes with three detection functions based on its environmental awareness capabilities. Called Structural Health and Knock Emission (Shake) sensor, it has been upgraded to recognise structure-borne sound waves generated by contact or knocks on its body through
January 16, 2018 Read time: 2 mins

To enable higher levels of autonomous driving and allow OEMs and drivers the freedom to create more customized vehicles, 226 Hella is showcasing its multifunctional sensor at the North American International Auto show 2018, in Detroit. The solution comes with three detection functions based on its environmental awareness capabilities.

Called Structural Health and Knock Emission (Shake) sensor, it has been upgraded to recognise structure-borne sound waves generated by contact or knocks on its body through piezoelectric foil.

Shake’s adaptive impact detection uses two sensors on the front and rear of the vehicle to detect slight touches of other cars or pedestrians to its bumper at speeds up to approximately 12mph. It can also trigger a signal to stop vehicles to prevent further damage as well as detect contact and perform an emergency stop if any collision with obstructions occurs during parking.

The intelligent damage detection identifies the severity as well as the time and place of vehicle damage, including scratches, dents and paint damage. It also creates damage reports for owners and mobility companies, who may use autonomous vehicles in car-sharing applications.

In addition, smart touch detection offers drivers convenience and safety features by enabling them to control the vehicle with the touch of their hand.

Hella’s demo will also present an opportunity for attendees to witness its welcome lighting technologies as well as how lights can project graphics onto the ground, among other functions.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Polarised imaging gives enforcement clarity
    February 6, 2020
    Polarised imaging advances have finally allowed ITS technology to catch up with previously unenforceable international bans on smoking in cars, says Sony’s Stephane Clauss
  • Hella and Autoliv sign license and cooperation agreement
    May 18, 2012
    Hella Aglaia Mobile Vision, a subsidiary of Hella KGaA Hueck & Co., and Autoliv have agreed to cooperate and further develop their automotive forward-looking vision systems together. As part of the agreement that bundles the competencies of both companies, Hella Aglaia is selling an exclusive license on monovision based algorithms for traffic sign recognition (TSR), lane detection and light source recognition to Autoliv. By monitoring traffic signs, TSR helps the driver to keep the correct speed and follow
  • Electric park brake technology gaining momentum in North America
    April 19, 2012
    TRW, a specialist in active and passive safety, says it has been awarded new business for its next-generation electric park brake (EPB) technology with two major North American based vehicle manufacturers. The system functions as a conventional hydraulic brake for standard service brake applications, and as an electric brake for parking and emergency braking. TRW launched the first integrated caliper EPB system in 2001 and is bringing the wide range of functional and ancillary benefits of EPB to the North A
  • Rear-view cameras ‘more effective than parking sensors’
    March 14, 2014
    Rear cameras are more effective than parking sensors at helping drivers avoid objects while travelling in reverse, but they don't help in every situation, a new Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) study shows. The study, conducted with volunteer drivers in an empty parking lot in the Los Angeles area, indicates that cameras would help prevent more reversing crashes into pedestrians in the vehicle's blind zone than parking sensors. Surprisingly, cameras by themselves worked better than sensors a