ASECAP cautiously welcomes EU agreement on VRU safety

Tolling organisation ASECAP has welcomed a European agreement which would force governments to take ‘systematic account’ of vulnerable road users (VRUs). But it warns that the industry must guard against any unintended consequences of the provisional agreement between the European Council and European Parliament, which is designed to strengthen road infrastructure management in a bid to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. The wording has yet to be endorsed by the Council and the relevant European Par
March 4, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

Tolling organisation 486 ASECAP has welcomed a European agreement which would force governments to take ‘systematic account’ of vulnerable road users (VRUs).

But it warns that the industry must guard against any unintended consequences of the provisional agreement between the European Council and European Parliament, which is designed to strengthen road infrastructure management in a bid to reduce fatalities and serious injuries.

The wording has yet to be endorsed by the Council and the relevant European Parliament committee.

But if passed it will become mandatory to take into account pedestrians, cyclists and other VRUs – who made up almost half of road fatalities in the 1816 European Union in 2017 - in road safety management procedures.

The proposed reform will extend the scope of current rules to motorways and other primary roads beyond the trans-European transport network (TEN-T). Policy makers say this will “contribute significantly to the improvement of road infrastructure safety” across the European Union. The directive is also expected to cover roads outside urban areas that are built using EU funding.

The proposal introduces a network-wide road safety assessment, which is described as “a snapshot of the entire road network covered by the directive used to evaluate accident risk”. Authorities will use this data to either introduce more targeted road safety inspections or to take immediate action to resolve a safety blackspot.

But ASECAP warns that “several suggested proposals must be very carefully studied, otherwise the application of them can produce the opposite results of the expected ones”.

The organisation suggests there should be “detailed analysis of each accident, before a general assessment of road infrastructure sections takes place”, and insists this analysis must be based on facts.

“Parameters like the vehicle type, age and classifications, as well as driver’s behaviours, education and incomes could lead to very useful inputs on the analysis of the accidents,” ASECAP suggests in a statement.

It also expresses concern that existing safety procedures must not be compromised by the new rules.

“ASECAP would like to stress that any change on current procedure may jeopardise the proven efficiency of existing tools,” it points out.

Detection, Monitoring & Machine Vision

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • SafeRide: it’s time to act on cyberattacks
    May 10, 2019
    Cyber threats are increasing rapidly and conventional security measures are unable to keep up. Ben Spencer talks to SafeRide’s Gil Reiter about what OEMs can do now As more vehicles become connected, so the potential threats to their security increase. Gil Reiter, vice president of product management for security firm SafeRide, says the biggest ‘attack surface’ for connected cars is their internet connectivity - and the in-vehicle applications that use the internet connection. “The most vulnerable co
    Read More
  • IAM Roadsmart: drivers must be more alert to protect pedestrians
    May 25, 2018
    UK charity IAM RoadSmart is urging drivers to be more alert as pedestrians now make up a quarter of all road deaths on the country’s roads. IAM refers to figures released by the Department for Transport (DfT) for 2016 – the most recent figures available - which revealed 448 pedestrians were killed. This is an increase of 10% over 2015 - the DfT says drivers failed to look in 42% of crashes while pedestrians did not look in 54% incidents. In addition, a fifth of drivers failed to judge the other perso
    Read More
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t
    Read More
  • Data collection becoming a crowded market
    October 26, 2017
    New ways of gathering data can revolutionise traffic and travel management, so is the writing on the wall for the traditional methods? Jon Masters reports. There are two big industries that stand to be revolutionised by massive increases in data – healthcare and transportation, says Finlay Clarke, the UK managing director of the smartphone sat nav traffic app, Waze. “At present we’re really only at the start of how cities, in particular, will be transformed,” he says.
    Read More

Highlighted Content