ASECAP cautiously welcomes EU agreement on VRU safety

Tolling organisation ASECAP has welcomed a European agreement which would force governments to take ‘systematic account’ of vulnerable road users (VRUs). But it warns that the industry must guard against any unintended consequences of the provisional agreement between the European Council and European Parliament, which is designed to strengthen road infrastructure management in a bid to reduce fatalities and serious injuries. The wording has yet to be endorsed by the Council and the relevant European Par
March 4, 2019 Read time: 2 mins

Tolling organisation 486 ASECAP has welcomed a European agreement which would force governments to take ‘systematic account’ of vulnerable road users (VRUs).

But it warns that the industry must guard against any unintended consequences of the provisional agreement between the European Council and European Parliament, which is designed to strengthen road infrastructure management in a bid to reduce fatalities and serious injuries.

The wording has yet to be endorsed by the Council and the relevant European Parliament committee.

But if passed it will become mandatory to take into account pedestrians, cyclists and other VRUs – who made up almost half of road fatalities in the 1816 European Union in 2017 - in road safety management procedures.

The proposed reform will extend the scope of current rules to motorways and other primary roads beyond the trans-European transport network (TEN-T). Policy makers say this will “contribute significantly to the improvement of road infrastructure safety” across the European Union. The directive is also expected to cover roads outside urban areas that are built using EU funding.

The proposal introduces a network-wide road safety assessment, which is described as “a snapshot of the entire road network covered by the directive used to evaluate accident risk”. Authorities will use this data to either introduce more targeted road safety inspections or to take immediate action to resolve a safety blackspot.

But ASECAP warns that “several suggested proposals must be very carefully studied, otherwise the application of them can produce the opposite results of the expected ones”.

The organisation suggests there should be “detailed analysis of each accident, before a general assessment of road infrastructure sections takes place”, and insists this analysis must be based on facts.

“Parameters like the vehicle type, age and classifications, as well as driver’s behaviours, education and incomes could lead to very useful inputs on the analysis of the accidents,” ASECAP suggests in a statement.

It also expresses concern that existing safety procedures must not be compromised by the new rules.

“ASECAP would like to stress that any change on current procedure may jeopardise the proven efficiency of existing tools,” it points out.

Detection, Monitoring & Machine Vision

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ITS needs continuity at the policy-making level
    February 1, 2012
    ITS needs to be sold to politicians in plainer terms and we need to be encouraging greater continuity at the policy-making level says Josef Czako, chairman of the IRF's Policy Committee on ITS. At the ITS World Congress in New York in 2008, the International Road Federation (IRF) held the inaugural meeting of its Policy Committee on ITS. The Policy Committee's formation, says its chairman, Kapsch's Josef Czako, reflects an ongoing concern over the lack of deployment of ITS technology on roads in anything li
    Read More
  • Mobility pricing offers new tools for managing mobility
    November 23, 2017
    Mobility pricing is the best way of sustaining and enhancing mobility, argues Moving Forward Consulting’s Josef Czako. Mobility pricing (MP) is effectively the culmination of the ‘user pays’ principle and has been referred to in many policy discussions about electronic toll collection, road user charging (RUC), and pricing. MP not only reflects the ‘use more, pay more’ nature of RUC, it also takes account of the external cost of journeys including pollution, noise, the cost of congestion and accidents.
    Read More
  • EU transport committee votes for cross-border enforcement of traffic offences
    May 18, 2012
    Motorists who speed, ignore red lights or drink and drive when in a European country other than their own will be brought to book more easily, thanks to closer cooperation between European police forces and EU-wide enforcement of traffic rules, under plans approved yesterday by the European Parliament's transport committee. However, the UK and Ireland decided not to opt in to the system, while Denmark is entitled to opt out because the Council changed the legal basis of the directive from "transport" to "po
    Read More
  • ASECAP widens its influence and fosters debate in Dubrovnik
    August 5, 2013
    Jason Barnes reports from the ASECAP Days 2013 event, which took place in Dubrovnik. ASECAP, the European tolling association held its 41st annual Study and Information Days event in Dubrovnik, Croatia, which attracted more than 200 figures from the road infrastructure sector in Europe and beyond. A series of presentations over two days brought attendees up to date with developments in a variety of policy and technology fields and discussed a number of developing and new topics, such as GNSS-based tolling a
    Read More

Highlighted Content