Skip to main content

38 deaths on smart motorways in last five years, BBC reveals 

The UK government has told the BBC’s Panorama investigation programme that 38 people have been killed on smart motorways in the last five years. 
By Ben Spencer January 27, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Smart motorways are the subject of safety concerns in the UK (Picture: Highways England)

Smart motorways use the hard shoulder as an extra lane with the aim of improving traffic flow – but motoring organisations and safety groups have raised concerns that this puts drivers and breakdown assistance teams at risk.

The BBC says drivers who break down can be trapped in speeding traffic. 

Panorama sent a Freedom of Information request to Highways England, which revealed the number of ‘near misses’ on a section of the M25 motorway around London has increased 20-fold since the hard shoulder was removed in 2014. 

There were 72 near misses in the five years before the road was converted into a smart motorway – but this increased to 1,485 in the five years afterwards.

Additional findings revealed that one warning sign on the same stretch of the M25 has been out of action for 336 days. 

Transport secretary Grant Shapps emphasised the need to fix smart motorways because they are too confusing for drivers. 

"We absolutely have to have these as safe or safer than regular motorways or we shouldn't have them at all,” he told Panorama. 
The government is to publish a review which is expected to provide safety recommendations. 

Meanwhile a separate group of MPs will publish its own report calling for a halt to further smart highways until more research can be carried out into their safety. 

Highways England says plans to expand smart motorways were approved by ministers and is gathering facts about safety.

A spokesperson is quoted as saying: "Any death on our roads is one too many, and our deepest sympathies remain with the family and friends of those who lost their lives."
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • White lines? Cyclists need more
    August 5, 2020
    Just painting lines on the road isn’t sufficient to persuade most people to cycle – you need to separate them from motor vehicles altogether. David Arminas talks to transportation engineer Tyler Golly about the Covid ‘wake-up call’
  • ITS sector must use less confusing industry terms says Q-Free
    December 23, 2015
    For ITS to gain the recognition it deserves, Q-Free’s Knut Evensen argues that the sector must have a coherent message and avoid confusing the wider community with a bewildering array of terms and acronyms. Any industry or group of people will develop its own lexicon over time. The process is near-inevitable, as individuals’ knowledge bases increase and evolve, and terms for common wisdom are created and become truncated, or even slang. A danger, though, as a relatively small group looks to admit large numb
  • New system to prevent Hazchem and over-height vehicles entering tunnel
    August 20, 2015
    An impending move to free-flow charging prompted a search for automated dangerous goods identification and over-height detection systems at the Thames Crossing to the east of London. Manned toll booths are increasingly being consigned to history by the onslaught of all-electronic charging. However, a secondary function of the traditional manned plazas has been to prevent non-compliant vehicles using the facility or to tell a driver that that they need to use a specific lane or wait for an escort. Automating
  • UK Cyclists, pedestrians and equestrians need roads with them in mind
    January 12, 2018
    Cyclists, pedestrians and equestrians would prefer improvements on Highways England's (HE's) road network to be open to all types of user – but safely, with areas of greater risk identified and appropriate interventions made, according to a new report from Transport Focus (TF). The independent watchdog engaged with these road users across the UK who stressed the importance of the network in affecting their everyday lives. Key findings showed that safety is of crucial importance to all three groups when