Skip to main content

Intel outlines AV limits of perception

CES 2021: Intel boss Amnon Shashua suggests radar and Lidar as redundant add-ons
By Ben Spencer January 12, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Shashua: 'You have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics'

What is an acceptable failure rate of a vehicle's perception system?

And how does this influence the development and regulation of autonomous vehicles (AVs)?

These were among the key areas covered by Professor Amnon Shashua, senior vice president of Intel and chief executive officer of Mobileye at this week's CES 2021 event.

In an online session, Shashua revealed the company measures failure rate in terms of hours of driving. 

“If we google, we will find out that about 3.2 trillion miles a year in the US are being travelled by cars and there are about six million crashes a year,” he said.

“So divide one by another, you get: every 500,000 miles on average there is a crash.”

“Let's assume that 50% it's your fault in a crash, so let's make this one million and let's divide this by 20 miles per hour on average, so we get about once every 50,000 hours of driving we'll have a crash,” he added. 

Shashua then applied this level of performance to a scenario involving a robotic machine and the deployment of 50,000 cars. 

“It would mean that every hour on average, will have an accident that is our fault because it’s a failure of the perception system,” he continued.

“From a business perspective this not sustainable, and from a society perspective, I don't see regulators approving something like this so you have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics.”

Mobileye is acutely aware of this, having just announced it will be testing AVs in new cities this year: Detroit, Tokyo, Shanghai, Paris and (pending regulation) New York City.

From a technological point of view, Shashua insisted it is “so crucial to do the hard work” and not combine all the sensors at the beginning and carry out a “low-level fusion – which is easy to do”.

“Forget about the radars and Lidars, solve the difficult problem of doing an end-to-end, standalone, self-contained camera-only system and then add the radars and Lidars as a redundant add-on,” he concluded. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Active traffic management - challenges and benefits
    April 12, 2013
    Minnesota DoT has built one of the most intensive Active Traffic Management (ATM) systems on the road today. Like many ITS deployments, the state has gained benefits but also faces many challenges, as Pete Goldin reports. Smart Lanes is the brand name of Minnesota Department of Transportation’s (MnDoT) ATM system on I-35W in the Twin Cities Metro Area. The original system covered 16 miles of I-35W south of Minneapolis starting in 2009, and was extended by two miles in 2011. Additional ATM equipment was inst
  • ITS World Congress looks to new horizons in Montréal
    March 29, 2017
    ITS World Congress 2017 will highlight transformational technologies, integrated mobility and smart cities. “Today’s global transportation industry is at a transformational tipping point,” says Regina Hopper, president and CEO of the Intelligent Transportation Society of America (ITS America).
  • Navya showcases Autonom cab in Paris
    November 10, 2017
    Navya has unveiled its Autonom Cab (AC) in Paris to address challenges urban populations face when travelling in and around cities. The cab, designed to be completely autonomous, comes without a cockpit, steering wheel or pedals and can carry up to six passengers. It is capable of speeds up to 90km/h, but will average towards 50km/h to conform with local speed limits. The Navya app enables users to order an AC and open and close the vehicle’s doors to start it up. The cab is also capable of pre-empting
  • TM 2.0 boost TMC data feed and driver influence
    November 15, 2017
    TM 2.0 views connected vehicles and V2I as two-way communications channels, benefitting traffic management and drivers, as Alan Dron discovers. As connected vehicles are progressively rolled out there will come a point at which traffic managers and traffic management centres (TMCs) will have to gear up to cope with a rapidly-evolving road scenario. The TM 2.0 Platform (see box) is promoting a concept of new-generation traffic management (which carries the same TM 2.0 title) and is studying how future T