Skip to main content

Intel outlines AV limits of perception

CES 2021: Intel boss Amnon Shashua suggests radar and Lidar as redundant add-ons
By Ben Spencer January 12, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Shashua: 'You have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics'

What is an acceptable failure rate of a vehicle's perception system?

And how does this influence the development and regulation of autonomous vehicles (AVs)?

These were among the key areas covered by Professor Amnon Shashua, senior vice president of Intel and chief executive officer of Mobileye at this week's CES 2021 event.

In an online session, Shashua revealed the company measures failure rate in terms of hours of driving. 

“If we google, we will find out that about 3.2 trillion miles a year in the US are being travelled by cars and there are about six million crashes a year,” he said.

“So divide one by another, you get: every 500,000 miles on average there is a crash.”

“Let's assume that 50% it's your fault in a crash, so let's make this one million and let's divide this by 20 miles per hour on average, so we get about once every 50,000 hours of driving we'll have a crash,” he added. 

Shashua then applied this level of performance to a scenario involving a robotic machine and the deployment of 50,000 cars. 

“It would mean that every hour on average, will have an accident that is our fault because it’s a failure of the perception system,” he continued.

“From a business perspective this not sustainable, and from a society perspective, I don't see regulators approving something like this so you have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics.”

Mobileye is acutely aware of this, having just announced it will be testing AVs in new cities this year: Detroit, Tokyo, Shanghai, Paris and (pending regulation) New York City.

From a technological point of view, Shashua insisted it is “so crucial to do the hard work” and not combine all the sensors at the beginning and carry out a “low-level fusion – which is easy to do”.

“Forget about the radars and Lidars, solve the difficult problem of doing an end-to-end, standalone, self-contained camera-only system and then add the radars and Lidars as a redundant add-on,” he concluded. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    December 4, 2012
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m
  • Saving the smartphone zombies from themselves
    October 15, 2020
    As roads – particularly in cities – become busier, companies are fielding a steady trickle of products to keep pedestrians safe and vehicles flowing
  • Cadillac future is V2X, says General Motors
    June 7, 2018
    One of the biggest automotive manufacturers on the planet has signalled its intention to embrace cutting-edge ITS technology across an iconic brand. General Motors is to introduce vehicle-to-everything (V2X) communications – while extending a semi-autonomous, hands-free driver assistance feature - in its Cadillac range. The company made the announcement in a keynote speech at ITS America’s annual meeting in Detroit. Mark Reuss, GM executive vice president (above), global product development, purchasing an
  • Speed reduction measures - carrot or stick?
    January 23, 2012
    In Sweden, marketing company DDB Stockholm employed a mock speed camera as part of a promotional campaign for automotive manufacturer Volkswagen. The result was worldwide online interest and promotion of the debate over excessive speed to the national level. A developing trend in traffic management policy is to look at how to induce road users to modify their behaviour by incentivising change rather than forcing it through the application of penalties. There have been several studies conducted into this; an