Skip to main content

Intel outlines AV limits of perception

CES 2021: Intel boss Amnon Shashua suggests radar and Lidar as redundant add-ons
By Ben Spencer January 12, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Shashua: 'You have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics'

What is an acceptable failure rate of a vehicle's perception system?

And how does this influence the development and regulation of autonomous vehicles (AVs)?

These were among the key areas covered by Professor Amnon Shashua, senior vice president of Intel and chief executive officer of Mobileye at this week's CES 2021 event.

In an online session, Shashua revealed the company measures failure rate in terms of hours of driving. 

“If we google, we will find out that about 3.2 trillion miles a year in the US are being travelled by cars and there are about six million crashes a year,” he said.

“So divide one by another, you get: every 500,000 miles on average there is a crash.”

“Let's assume that 50% it's your fault in a crash, so let's make this one million and let's divide this by 20 miles per hour on average, so we get about once every 50,000 hours of driving we'll have a crash,” he added. 

Shashua then applied this level of performance to a scenario involving a robotic machine and the deployment of 50,000 cars. 

“It would mean that every hour on average, will have an accident that is our fault because it’s a failure of the perception system,” he continued.

“From a business perspective this not sustainable, and from a society perspective, I don't see regulators approving something like this so you have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics.”

Mobileye is acutely aware of this, having just announced it will be testing AVs in new cities this year: Detroit, Tokyo, Shanghai, Paris and (pending regulation) New York City.

From a technological point of view, Shashua insisted it is “so crucial to do the hard work” and not combine all the sensors at the beginning and carry out a “low-level fusion – which is easy to do”.

“Forget about the radars and Lidars, solve the difficult problem of doing an end-to-end, standalone, self-contained camera-only system and then add the radars and Lidars as a redundant add-on,” he concluded. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Increasing road safety with automated driver assistance systems
    January 26, 2012
    Jon Masters looks at how drivers will be trained to use the increasing number of advanced driver assistance systems being incorporated into modern cars
  • Imperatives to shape extended mobility ecosystems of tomorrow
    April 10, 2014
    New survey shows cities ill prepared to meet the increasing demand for urban mobility. Most of the world’s cities are ill-equipped to cope with the predicted increase in demands on urban travel – that is the stark finding of the second ‘Future of Urban Mobility’ study carried out by global management consultancy Arthur D. Little. Compiled in association with the International Association of Public Transport (UITP), the survey examines and rates urban mobility in 84 cities worldwide against an extended set o
  • Europe’s city drivers ‘spending up to US$27 an hour on owning a car’
    January 20, 2016
    Recent research carried out by Opinion Matters for Zipcar among 2,500 car owner/drivers in London, Barcelona, Paris and Madrid, who drive regularly within these cities indicates that drivers are spending up to US$27 an hour owning a car. The research, which was based specifically on city drivers that own a car worth up to US$21,000 at time of purchase tallied up typical car costs such as road tax, maintenance, insurance, petrol and parking, as well as taking into account depreciation over the year. It
  • Drivers tricked with phantom insurance by spoof online fraudsters
    December 18, 2013
    NFU Mutual, the UK’s leading rural insurer is urging drivers to consider the risk of ‘ghost brokers’ when insuring their car online. Illegal middlemen, known as ‘ghost brokers’, using fake websites that look very much like the real thing, are targeting people looking for cheaper car insurance by offering them products that are non-existent. The fraudsters are posing as legitimate insurance brokers targeting those people who are more likely to consider cut price insurance to help save money. Accordin