Skip to main content

Intel outlines AV limits of perception

CES 2021: Intel boss Amnon Shashua suggests radar and Lidar as redundant add-ons
By Ben Spencer January 12, 2021 Read time: 2 mins
Shashua: 'You have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics'

What is an acceptable failure rate of a vehicle's perception system?

And how does this influence the development and regulation of autonomous vehicles (AVs)?

These were among the key areas covered by Professor Amnon Shashua, senior vice president of Intel and chief executive officer of Mobileye at this week's CES 2021 event.

In an online session, Shashua revealed the company measures failure rate in terms of hours of driving. 

“If we google, we will find out that about 3.2 trillion miles a year in the US are being travelled by cars and there are about six million crashes a year,” he said.

“So divide one by another, you get: every 500,000 miles on average there is a crash.”

“Let's assume that 50% it's your fault in a crash, so let's make this one million and let's divide this by 20 miles per hour on average, so we get about once every 50,000 hours of driving we'll have a crash,” he added. 

Shashua then applied this level of performance to a scenario involving a robotic machine and the deployment of 50,000 cars. 

“It would mean that every hour on average, will have an accident that is our fault because it’s a failure of the perception system,” he continued.

“From a business perspective this not sustainable, and from a society perspective, I don't see regulators approving something like this so you have to be 1,000 times better than these statistics.”

Mobileye is acutely aware of this, having just announced it will be testing AVs in new cities this year: Detroit, Tokyo, Shanghai, Paris and (pending regulation) New York City.

From a technological point of view, Shashua insisted it is “so crucial to do the hard work” and not combine all the sensors at the beginning and carry out a “low-level fusion – which is easy to do”.

“Forget about the radars and Lidars, solve the difficult problem of doing an end-to-end, standalone, self-contained camera-only system and then add the radars and Lidars as a redundant add-on,” he concluded. 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Parking provision dictates commuters’ modal choice
    March 16, 2016
    Researchers from two American Universities have found the provision of parking spaces can encourage automobile use and increase traffic congestion. It is well understood that increased automobile use is linked to congestion, environmental degradation and negative health and safety impacts. Trials of smart parking technology has shown a reduction in circulating traffic (looking for parking) can ease congestion and that the cost of parking can influence commuters’ modal choice. Now, researchers at the univers
  • Do buses need subsidies in congestion charging areas
    June 20, 2016
    David Crawford takes a look at the debate surrounding bus subsidies. Subsidies for public transport are a well-known and frequently-used policy tool directed at reducing the high environmental and social costs of peak-period traffic congestion. But at the end of last year the Swedish Centre for Transport Studies published a working paper entitled ‘Should buses still be subsidised in Stockholm?’ This concluded that the subsidy levels currently being applied in Stockholm could be nearly halved by setting bus
  • The twisting path to enforcement’s future
    June 5, 2014
    Survey reveals some division of views about enforcement’s future as Colin Sowman discovers. Technological advances and legislative changes pose many questions for those involved in road enforcement, ranging from the changing demands of privacy and data protection legislation to the practicalities on multi-speed enforcement. So to get the industry’s views ITS International took soundings on some of these bigger questions. In a world where many vehicles are fitted with GPS linked ‘black box’ telematics system
  • Time for a rethink on road user charging
    February 1, 2012
    There is no value in further US VMT charging trials, except to delay the inevitable. These trials should end after completion of the University of Iowa's National Evaluation of a Mileage-based Road User Charge. There is far greater promise in unleashing private operators to commence profitable, non-tolling services, then using these for toll assessment and collection as fuel distributors are currently used to collect fuel taxation. Bern Grush writes