Skip to main content

Citilabs announces Cube version 5

Citilabs has released its next-generation product line, Cube 5. This new version of Cube has been developed using ESRI's ArcGIS technology, providing software users with significant advancements in productivity, analysis and data-sharing. Cube users will now be able to store transportation networks as ESRI geodatabases, utilising ESRI feature classes. Citilabs says moving data back and forth between models and GIS has never been easier, saving transportation agencies and consultants time and money.
March 13, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
Citilabs has released its next-generation product line, Cube 5. This new version of Cube has been developed using 50 ESRI's ArcGIS technology, providing software users with significant advancements in productivity, analysis and data-sharing. Cube users will now be able to store transportation networks as ESRI geodatabases, utilising ESRI feature classes. Citilabs says moving data back and forth between models and GIS has never been easier, saving transportation agencies and consultants time and money.

Cube 5 will allow an existing Cube user the choice to keep the traditional Cube networks or to convert all their data, with a click of a mouse, to an ArcGIS personal geodatabase. This capability makes it much faster and easier to pass data between ArcGIS applications and Cube applications. This is a two-way capability, so information generated or stored in a Cube model can be passed to an ArcGIS application for further processing and analysis. Conversely, transportation or land use information stored in a geodatabase can be transparently passed to a Cube model. For agencies with significant commitments to ESRI software and employee training in this area, the improved productivity offered by Cube 5's ability to directly process and store geodatabases will enhance the return on their GIS investments.

"Given the myriad uses of GIS software at national, regional, and local transportation agencies, I believe the productivity and flexibility Cube 5 offers will be eye-opening," suggests Ernie Ott, Citilabs VP. "In the past, joint users of ESRI and transportation modelling software would have to carefully consider how they approach a complex analysis in order to take advantage of the strengths of each platform. They would also consider where data might reside or be generated. The interoperability of applications using an ArcGIS geodatabase and applications based in Cube will remove some data processing steps from their workflows and often reduce the complexity of these procedures."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Partnership to deliver world’s first could-based transport and traffic analytics solution
    July 12, 2012
    A partnership between AirSage and Citilabs has announced Cube Cloud, which is claimed to be the world’s first cloud-based traffic analytics solution. Using AirSage’s cell phone signal analysis data, Cube Cloud combines the convenience of an online solution with accurate population movement data to deliver efficient transportation analysis and modelling.
  • Developments in signal head lens technology
    February 3, 2012
    Heads and tails Leading manufacturers of traffic signal systems discuss developments in signal head technology as well as some of the legacy issues which affect future deployments Transparent model of Dambach's ACTROS.line technology, showing the bus electronics in the signal head Cowls could be superseded by the greater use of lens technology
  • Smartphone - the next technology for charging and tolling?
    January 25, 2012
    With all the debates over the most suitable future technology or technologies for charging and tolling, is it not time for the industry to look at what the rest of ITS is doing and bring a rank outsider - the smart phone - closer into the fold? By Jack Opiola, D'Artagnan Consulting LLC
  • ITS advancement lays beyond benefit-cost analysis
    May 29, 2013
    Shelley Row, former Director of the US Department of Transportation’s ITS Joint Program Office, gives her views on the way forward for the industry. We, as intelligent transportation system (ITS) proponents and engineers, tend to be overly fixated on benefit-cost data. We want decisions to be made on logical grounds for which benefit-cost calculations are optimal. While benefit-cost data is necessary, it is not always sufficient. We can learn from our history where we see three broad groups of ITS deploymen