Skip to main content

Audit finds red light cameras make intersections safer

An audit carried out by the Portland, Oregon, City Auditor’s office found that crash rates at red light camera intersections in the city were lower than before the cameras were installed and were also lower than at most dangerous intersections without cameras. The City of Portland uses 11 cameras at 10 intersections to enforce laws against red-light running and to improve safety. The Police Bureau operates the red light camera program and oversees a vendor who owns the cameras and issues citations once the
July 24, 2015 Read time: 2 mins

An audit carried out by the Portland, Oregon, City Auditor’s office found that crash rates at red light camera intersections in the city were lower than before the cameras were installed and were also lower than at most dangerous intersections without cameras.

The City of Portland uses 11 cameras at 10 intersections to enforce laws against red-light running and to improve safety. The Police Bureau operates the red light camera program and oversees a vendor who owns the cameras and issues citations once the Police Bureau approves them.

The Bureau of Transportation identified the intersections for red light camera enforcement and produces safety data. The State sets the fine amount and the Circuit Court collects and processes red light camera citation payments.

The audit was carried out to determine if the City’s red light camera program has met its goals, is following select best practices and has clearly defined roles for the bureaus and vendor. It also reviewed program costs and cost recovery.

The auditors say that, while the trend is encouraging, the safety data should be interpreted with caution. The audit also found that some best practices are followed or partially followed; that the roles of Police and Transportation, and to a lesser extent the vendor and Court, need additional clarifying; and that the program sometimes covers its costs but not always.

The audit concluded that City’s use of red light cameras would benefit from strategic planning for the next phase of the program, including reviews of costs and best practices; improved clarity of roles; and more attention to ensure that the vendor’s processes are up-to-date and producing optimal results.

Related Content

  • Traffic lights: There’s a better way ..
    July 9, 2014
    .. say researchers at Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) who have developed a means of computing optimal timings for city stoplights that they say can significantly reduce drivers’ average travel times. Existing software for timing traffic signals has several limitations, says Carolina Osorio, an assistant professor of civil and environmental engineering at MIT and lead author of a forthcoming paper in the journal Transportation Science that describes the new system, based on a study of traffic
  • Traffic cameras embrace AI
    December 19, 2022
    Artificial intelligence is spreading into many aspects of mobility – but what about traffic management and enforcement cameras? ITS International invited a few vision experts to ponder a couple of leading questions…
  • Texas moves to prevent wrong-way drivers
    May 30, 2014
    A study has shown the extent and ramifications of wrong way driving and proposed cost-effective countermeasures. Wrong way driving collisions occur relatively infrequently but the results can be devastating. Statistics from the US National Transportation Safety Board, an independent, federal all-modes agency, reveal that wrong way (WW) driving, account for only about 3% of accidents on high-speed divided highways but are much more likely to result in fatal and serious injuries.
  • Chicago red light cameras ‘provide few safety benefits’
    December 22, 2014
    Chicago's red light cameras fail to deliver the dramatic safety benefits long claimed by City Hall, according to a first-ever scientific study that found the nation's largest camera program is responsible for increasing some types of injury crashes while decreasing others.