Skip to main content

Audit finds red light cameras make intersections safer

An audit carried out by the Portland, Oregon, City Auditor’s office found that crash rates at red light camera intersections in the city were lower than before the cameras were installed and were also lower than at most dangerous intersections without cameras. The City of Portland uses 11 cameras at 10 intersections to enforce laws against red-light running and to improve safety. The Police Bureau operates the red light camera program and oversees a vendor who owns the cameras and issues citations once the
July 24, 2015 Read time: 2 mins

An audit carried out by the Portland, Oregon, City Auditor’s office found that crash rates at red light camera intersections in the city were lower than before the cameras were installed and were also lower than at most dangerous intersections without cameras.

The City of Portland uses 11 cameras at 10 intersections to enforce laws against red-light running and to improve safety. The Police Bureau operates the red light camera program and oversees a vendor who owns the cameras and issues citations once the Police Bureau approves them.

The Bureau of Transportation identified the intersections for red light camera enforcement and produces safety data. The State sets the fine amount and the Circuit Court collects and processes red light camera citation payments.

The audit was carried out to determine if the City’s red light camera program has met its goals, is following select best practices and has clearly defined roles for the bureaus and vendor. It also reviewed program costs and cost recovery.

The auditors say that, while the trend is encouraging, the safety data should be interpreted with caution. The audit also found that some best practices are followed or partially followed; that the roles of Police and Transportation, and to a lesser extent the vendor and Court, need additional clarifying; and that the program sometimes covers its costs but not always.

The audit concluded that City’s use of red light cameras would benefit from strategic planning for the next phase of the program, including reviews of costs and best practices; improved clarity of roles; and more attention to ensure that the vendor’s processes are up-to-date and producing optimal results.

Related Content

  • Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    November 28, 2012
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions
  • Polarised imaging gives enforcement clarity
    February 6, 2020
    Polarised imaging advances have finally allowed ITS technology to catch up with previously unenforceable international bans on smoking in cars, says Sony’s Stephane Clauss
  • Safety drive finds speed violators on Kansas highways
    September 9, 2024
    Kansas DoT's five-year Safety Corridor Pilot Program reaches end of first year
  • American Traffic Solutions
    March 16, 2012
    The City of Edmonton in the Alberta province of western Canada has a system in place which American Traffic Solutions (ATS) believes exemplifies how a road safety camera programme should be operated. Edmonton’s programme began in September 1999 with six cameras rotating through 12 locations. Nearly 10 years later, at the beginning of 2009, provincial legislation was passed allowing police agencies in Alberta to use road safety cameras to enforce both red light and speed infractions.