Skip to main content

Dynamic messaging has its drawbacks

Dynamic message signs are a proven means of getting information to drivers on the road – but they have their drawbacks. Robert Gordon looks at the possibilities of expanding DMS capability by bringing that information into the cars themselves Delivery of traffic information to motorists by dynamic message signs (DMS) has proven to be popular and is a principal tool for conveying information developed by the traffic management centre (TMC) to the public. There are, however, limitations in the use of ph
December 5, 2018 Read time: 6 mins
ID 97760139 © | Dreamstime.com
Dynamic message signs are a proven means of getting information to drivers on the road – but they have their drawbacks. Robert Gordon looks at the possibilities of expanding DMS capability by bringing that information into the cars themselves


Delivery of traffic information to motorists by dynamic message signs (DMS) has proven to be popular and is a principal tool for conveying information developed by the traffic management centre (TMC) to the public. There are, however, limitations in the use of physical DMS as the means of motorist communication (see Limitations of DMS).

ETSIMS Lite helps motorists avoid these problems by bringing the information into the vehicle (with an audio presentation to the motorist) at ap-propriate locations in advance of the physical sign, thereby expanding the ‘reach’ of the sign. In many cases, physical DMS on surface streets has a rela-tively narrow reach because motorists on nearby links who may also benefit from the message have no view of it. The ETSIMS Lite messages may be more comprehensive than those on the physical DMS. ETSIMS Lite also supports the capability to provide in-vehicle messages at locations for which no physical sign is present (pseudo DMS).  Because of physical constraints or environmental limitations, it is sometimes not feasible to place DMS at the desired location on surface streets – so pseudo DMS may be used for this purpose.   

ETSIMS Lite provides compatibility for devices for active traffic management (ATM). These include lane control signals, variable speed limit signs and active pavement markings in addition to DMS. ETSIMS Lite synthesises messages designed to capture the intent of the ATM controls and to provide it at appropriate vehicle locations.

Arterial DMS


Figure 1 illustrates the geometric relationships that characterise ETSIMS Lite. It shows a DMS located on an arterial that also has immediate access to a freeway. A catchment domain is associated with the DMS. The figure defines a set of directional roadway links within the catchment domain. If a vehicle is on one of the appropriate links and travelling in the appropriate direction, it will display the DMS message or an appropriate enhancement of the message by audio techniques. Thus, the catchment domain serves to define the vehicle’s eligibility to receive the message and expands the reach of the DMS.  Receiving these messages in the catchment domain facilitates the motorist’s decision to choose or not in a corridor consisting of a freeway and parallel arterials at a more convenient time in the journey, and provides the motorist with more diversion options for vehicles with appropriate loca-tions and headings.

The figure also shows a management domain associated with the DMS and represents the locations for which most of the messages on the DMS will apply. For the DMS in the figure, the messages may apply to the freeway as well as to the surface streets. The management domain helps to establish the priority in which messages will be displayed, and helps to provide criteria to limit the length of messages to avoid driver distraction.

Figure 2 shows the potential application of these concepts to two DMS on Long Island, New York. DMS 1 informs westbound motorists on the Southern State Parkway (a limited access facility) and DMS 2 serves westbound Sunrise Highway (a major surface street arterial). The DMS messages will be accessible to motorists on selected links within the catchment domain outlines. Note that the catchment domain for DMS 1 includes an additional lim-ited access highway (NY 135).

Depending on the vehicle’s location, it may be in the catchment domain of more than one DMS and may therefore receive a number of messages. In order to minimise cognitive driver distraction, ETSIMS Lite couples a priority for the message with a total message size limitation thus assuring recep-tion and display of the most important messages while limiting the potential for motorist distraction. Each ETSIMS Lite message contains the location of the physical DMS or the pseudo DMS for which the message applies.


Synthesising messages


In the case of travel time messages, the vehicle’s actual location will, in most cases, differ from the physical sign location. As a user-selected alternate to the travel time message (which is developed for the DMS location), a description of congestion conditions may be provided. The type of condition de-scriptor messages (e.g. comparison with speed limit) may be used.

ETSIMS Lite provides compatibility for devices for active traffic management (ATM). These include lane control signals, variable speed limit signs and active pavement markings in addition to DMS. ETSIMS Lite synthesises messages designed to capture the intent of the ATM controls and to provide it at appropriate vehicle locations.

Figure 3 shows the general architecture for ETSIMS Lite and summarises its major features. The ETSIMS Lite server is located at the TMC, is operated by a TMC operator, and may be a separate physical unit or functionally integrated with the TMC’s management system. It receives the DMS messages and indications of active traffic management device status from the TMC management system. 

The TMC operator functions for ETSIMS Lite include the following:


• Accept TMC messages for the corresponding ETSIMS Lite DMS, or modify the message to provide more detail. Many TMCs use pre-scripted DMS messages, and this pre-scripted set may be enhanced to include expanded ETSIMS Lite messages.

• Accept or modify message priorities, which help to limit the length of the entire set of messages received by the motorist. Priorities are pre-scripted for classes of incidents, delays or other events. In the case of travel time messages, they may be derived from a comparison of current and historic travel time.

• Develop messages for pseudo DMS or select from a pre-scripted set.

• Select messages to describe the intent of active traffic management displays from a pre-scripted set.

As shown in Figure 3, communication from the ETSIMS server to the vehicle is likely to be implemented using cellular phone technology and a suitable website such as the state’s 911 site together with a smartphone app. Audio presentation of the messages is the simplest and least distracting technique and is currently available to most motorists. Alternatively, the connected vehicle architecture comprising roadside units (RSUs) and on-board units may be employed. If the latter approach is used, RSUs are required at appropriate locations in the catchment domains. In some cases, RSUs may already be present at these locations for other purposes.

ETSIMS Lite requires an operator and is best suited for use by organisations that operate TMCs. ETSIMS Alpha is intended for use by organisations such as traffic information services that do not operate TMCs and do not develop and implement the DMS messages. While the ETSIMS Alpha server does not require an operator, it cannot perform some functions of ETSIMS Lite such as enhancement of DMS messages and development of messages for pseudo DMS.

Related Content

  • Bigger role for data protection and privacy policies in transportation
    June 11, 2015
    Dr Caitlin Cottrill, lecturer at the University of Aberdeen’s School of Geosciences, examines the impact of privacy legislation on the transportation sector. Growing reliance on big data, underscored by the increasing ubiquity of smart infrastructure and the ‘Internet of Things’, has profoundly impacted the regulatory environment experienced by transportation professionals. This is particularly the case in relation to the privacy of personally identifying information (PII). There has been increased attenti
  • USDoT looks at the costs and potential benefits of connected vehicles
    October 26, 2017
    David Crawford looks at latest lessons learned from the trials of connected vehicles in the US. The progress of connected vehicle (CV) technologies takes centre stage among the hot topics highlighted in the September 2017 edition – the first since 2014 – of the ‘ITS Benefits, Costs and Lessons Learned’ survey from the US ITS Joint Program Office (JPO). The organisation is an arm of the US Department of Transportation (USDoT).
  • Plug and play approach unifies workzone ITS
    July 18, 2012
    Caltrans District 7 is finalising a ConOps document which will detail a plug-and-play to work zone ITS operation. The organisation's Allen Z. Chen elaborates. Before August is out, on current planning, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) District 7 (which covers Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, with a combined population of close to 11 million people) intends to have finalised a Concept of Operations (ConOps) document dealing with Work Zone Transportation Management Systems (WZTMS). The
  • IntelliDrive and HOT lanes - the next generation?
    January 30, 2012
    Janet Banner, Metropolitan Transportation Commission, and Christopher Hill, Mixon Hill, Inc., outline efforts to explore the use of IntelliDrive technologies in HOT lane applications. On 21 October last year more than 100 transportation professionals came together for a workshop, either in person or via a webinar, to discuss the potential role of IntelliDriveSM technologies in enhancing the operations of High-Occupancy Toll (HOT) lanes. The discussions focused on a White Paper, commissioned by the Metropoli