Skip to main content

Dynamic messaging has its drawbacks

Dynamic message signs are a proven means of getting information to drivers on the road – but they have their drawbacks. Robert Gordon looks at the possibilities of expanding DMS capability by bringing that information into the cars themselves Delivery of traffic information to motorists by dynamic message signs (DMS) has proven to be popular and is a principal tool for conveying information developed by the traffic management centre (TMC) to the public. There are, however, limitations in the use of ph
December 5, 2018 Read time: 6 mins
ID 97760139 © | Dreamstime.com
Dynamic message signs are a proven means of getting information to drivers on the road – but they have their drawbacks. Robert Gordon looks at the possibilities of expanding DMS capability by bringing that information into the cars themselves


Delivery of traffic information to motorists by dynamic message signs (DMS) has proven to be popular and is a principal tool for conveying information developed by the traffic management centre (TMC) to the public. There are, however, limitations in the use of physical DMS as the means of motorist communication (see Limitations of DMS).

ETSIMS Lite helps motorists avoid these problems by bringing the information into the vehicle (with an audio presentation to the motorist) at ap-propriate locations in advance of the physical sign, thereby expanding the ‘reach’ of the sign. In many cases, physical DMS on surface streets has a rela-tively narrow reach because motorists on nearby links who may also benefit from the message have no view of it. The ETSIMS Lite messages may be more comprehensive than those on the physical DMS. ETSIMS Lite also supports the capability to provide in-vehicle messages at locations for which no physical sign is present (pseudo DMS).  Because of physical constraints or environmental limitations, it is sometimes not feasible to place DMS at the desired location on surface streets – so pseudo DMS may be used for this purpose.   

ETSIMS Lite provides compatibility for devices for active traffic management (ATM). These include lane control signals, variable speed limit signs and active pavement markings in addition to DMS. ETSIMS Lite synthesises messages designed to capture the intent of the ATM controls and to provide it at appropriate vehicle locations.

Arterial DMS


Figure 1 illustrates the geometric relationships that characterise ETSIMS Lite. It shows a DMS located on an arterial that also has immediate access to a freeway. A catchment domain is associated with the DMS. The figure defines a set of directional roadway links within the catchment domain. If a vehicle is on one of the appropriate links and travelling in the appropriate direction, it will display the DMS message or an appropriate enhancement of the message by audio techniques. Thus, the catchment domain serves to define the vehicle’s eligibility to receive the message and expands the reach of the DMS.  Receiving these messages in the catchment domain facilitates the motorist’s decision to choose or not in a corridor consisting of a freeway and parallel arterials at a more convenient time in the journey, and provides the motorist with more diversion options for vehicles with appropriate loca-tions and headings.

The figure also shows a management domain associated with the DMS and represents the locations for which most of the messages on the DMS will apply. For the DMS in the figure, the messages may apply to the freeway as well as to the surface streets. The management domain helps to establish the priority in which messages will be displayed, and helps to provide criteria to limit the length of messages to avoid driver distraction.

Figure 2 shows the potential application of these concepts to two DMS on Long Island, New York. DMS 1 informs westbound motorists on the Southern State Parkway (a limited access facility) and DMS 2 serves westbound Sunrise Highway (a major surface street arterial). The DMS messages will be accessible to motorists on selected links within the catchment domain outlines. Note that the catchment domain for DMS 1 includes an additional lim-ited access highway (NY 135).

Depending on the vehicle’s location, it may be in the catchment domain of more than one DMS and may therefore receive a number of messages. In order to minimise cognitive driver distraction, ETSIMS Lite couples a priority for the message with a total message size limitation thus assuring recep-tion and display of the most important messages while limiting the potential for motorist distraction. Each ETSIMS Lite message contains the location of the physical DMS or the pseudo DMS for which the message applies.


Synthesising messages


In the case of travel time messages, the vehicle’s actual location will, in most cases, differ from the physical sign location. As a user-selected alternate to the travel time message (which is developed for the DMS location), a description of congestion conditions may be provided. The type of condition de-scriptor messages (e.g. comparison with speed limit) may be used.

ETSIMS Lite provides compatibility for devices for active traffic management (ATM). These include lane control signals, variable speed limit signs and active pavement markings in addition to DMS. ETSIMS Lite synthesises messages designed to capture the intent of the ATM controls and to provide it at appropriate vehicle locations.

Figure 3 shows the general architecture for ETSIMS Lite and summarises its major features. The ETSIMS Lite server is located at the TMC, is operated by a TMC operator, and may be a separate physical unit or functionally integrated with the TMC’s management system. It receives the DMS messages and indications of active traffic management device status from the TMC management system. 

The TMC operator functions for ETSIMS Lite include the following:


• Accept TMC messages for the corresponding ETSIMS Lite DMS, or modify the message to provide more detail. Many TMCs use pre-scripted DMS messages, and this pre-scripted set may be enhanced to include expanded ETSIMS Lite messages.

• Accept or modify message priorities, which help to limit the length of the entire set of messages received by the motorist. Priorities are pre-scripted for classes of incidents, delays or other events. In the case of travel time messages, they may be derived from a comparison of current and historic travel time.

• Develop messages for pseudo DMS or select from a pre-scripted set.

• Select messages to describe the intent of active traffic management displays from a pre-scripted set.

As shown in Figure 3, communication from the ETSIMS server to the vehicle is likely to be implemented using cellular phone technology and a suitable website such as the state’s 911 site together with a smartphone app. Audio presentation of the messages is the simplest and least distracting technique and is currently available to most motorists. Alternatively, the connected vehicle architecture comprising roadside units (RSUs) and on-board units may be employed. If the latter approach is used, RSUs are required at appropriate locations in the catchment domains. In some cases, RSUs may already be present at these locations for other purposes.

ETSIMS Lite requires an operator and is best suited for use by organisations that operate TMCs. ETSIMS Alpha is intended for use by organisations such as traffic information services that do not operate TMCs and do not develop and implement the DMS messages. While the ETSIMS Alpha server does not require an operator, it cannot perform some functions of ETSIMS Lite such as enhancement of DMS messages and development of messages for pseudo DMS.

Related Content

  • Cost Benefit: Utah traffic light scheme pays dividends
    March 15, 2019
    A traffic signal control scheme in Utah is being taken up by other US authorities. David Crawford finds out how the Beehive State is leading the way in DoT and driver savings Growing numbers of US state departments of transportation (DoTs) and their road users are gaining real financial benefits from an advanced approach to traffic signal monitoring recently developed in Utah. Central to the system is its use of automated traffic signal performance measures (ATSPM) technology, brought in to improve th
  • Integrated corridor management 'to enhance travel efficiency'
    August 29, 2012
    New systems of software are coming together to form the technological backbone of a project that will apply practically to one corridor in Dallas, but influence travel across a wider area. Dallas Area Rapid Transit (DART) is the lead agency for an extensive Integrated Corridor Management (ICM) project in Dallas, covering an area stretching north east of downtown Dallas, 20 miles long by two miles wide. The corridor is defined loosely by the US-75 freeway and DART’s light rail ‘red line’. These are the theor
  • Improving urban traffic control in Atlanta
    January 27, 2012
    Hugh Colton, Georgia DOT details move to improve urban traffic control in the Atlanta area. With a significant proportion of traffic using freeways and toll-ways, along with a significant investment in roadway infrastructure, urban arterials are often the poor relation when it comes to ITS investment. Hitherto the primary means of Urban Traffic Control (UTC) has been the ubiquitous traffic signal. Many traffic signals still operate in a standalone mode and traffic detection is often broken, leaving the sign
  • Integrating traffic systems improves management and control
    April 25, 2012
    Following a successful trial in 2007, VicRoads has adopted Streams Motorway Management from Transmax as its primary traffic management and control system Throughout the world, the avoidable social cost of traffic congestion continues to rise each year with increased motorisation, urbanisation and population growth. Traffic congestion is responsible for an increase in travel times, vehicle operating costs and carbon emissions. In 2007, VicRoads commissioned Streams Motorway Management for the M1 Monash Freew