Skip to main content

World's first dual speed enforcement

Vitronic has claimed a world first for its next-generation speed enforcement solution that enables police forces to provide fixed and mobile speed enforcement from a single installation. The 'dual-use' housing system consists of LIDAR (laser-based) technology which can capture speeding vehicles on up to three lanes in a single direction.
March 8, 2012 Read time: 2 mins
147 Vitronic has claimed a world first for its next-generation speed enforcement solution that enables police forces to provide fixed and mobile speed enforcement from a single installation. The 'dual-use' housing system consists of LIDAR (laser-based) technology which can capture speeding vehicles on up to three lanes in a single direction.

A standard mobile PoliScan enforcement system mounted in a protective stationary housing means that when mobile operation is required, it can be removed easily, transferred to a tripod/vehicle and then reinstalled after mobile surveillance is completed.

Other than this unique dual-use functionality, Vitronic says the housing provides additional benefits. When installed, the mobile system is mounted on to an internal metal wall. To provide complete protection from external interference the inner housing is surrounded by a second casing constructed from steel plates. Clear security glass also offers a safeguard from vandalism. The outer steel housing also serves as a sun roof to prevent the inner housing from direct sunshine and to help provide maximum violation capture rates.

Vitronic points out that this solution also comes with the usual benefits and quality standards expected from the company's PoliScanSpeed products. The core laser technology provides a multi-lane, multi-vehicle capacity with lane-specific speed detection. This enables all violations to be acquired, regardless of their speed or position on the road - vehicles travelling parallel and tailgating are all measured at speeds of up to 250km/h (155mph). The encrypted case files, with a digital signature, can then be sent to the back office system PoliScanOffice for further processing. This software provides Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) and creates documents which are valid in a court of law.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Introducing the CitySync automated license plate recognition solution
    September 20, 2012
    Image Sensing Systems, US-based supplier of software-based detection solutions for ITS, law enforcement, security and parking, introduces its CitySync Automated License Plate Recognition (LPR) solution, the latest in LPR technology and software. The CitySync ALPR is a complete system and includes the company’s LPR cameras, highly accurate recognition software and their Jet-BOF back-office system, a fully functional, web-based back-office that provides storage, matching and reporting of LPR data. The system
  • Future of tolling: the priorities
    January 14, 2020
    In the final part of his investigation into the future of tolling technology, Josef Czako of Moving Forward Consulting asks what industry figures see as the priorities going forward…
  • Videalert launches civil enforcement as a service
    June 23, 2015
    UK enforcement supplier Videalert has launched a civil enforcement as a service (CEaaS) solution. Using the company’s Department for Transport Manufacturer Certified hosted platform, CEaaS enables councils to significantly change the way they specify and procure CCTV–based enforcement systems. It introduces the ability to purchase CCTV traffic services on demand with installations taking place in days rather than months. Available for a fixed monthly cost per location or on a fee-per-PCN basis, CEaaS
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t