Skip to main content

Visible enforcement makes roads safer: study

US research shows that high visibility is factor in reducing dangerous driving behaviours
By Adam Hill June 14, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
Drivers tend to behave better if they think police might see them (© Vilaimages | Dreamstime.com)

A study by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has confirmed that when drivers can see police are on hand to enforce the laws of the road, safety improves.

The synthesis of existing research examined data across 80 studies on the relationship between high visibility enforcement (HVE) and safety outcomes.

It focused on seatbelt wearing, speeding and drunk, distracted and aggressive driving - and showed that seat belt use rates increase an average of 3.5 percentage points with an HVE campaign.

One additional checkpoint per 100,000 people per week increased the belt use rate by 0.76 percentage points, according to the analysis.

The study was conducted by the National Cooperative Research and Evaluation Program, a federal research initiative managed by NHTSA and Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA).

They say even relatively small increases in the belt use rate can translate to hundreds of lives saved: the federal 'Click It or Ticket' campaign has seen belt use rise from 58% in 1994 to more than 90% in 2020.

"But alarmingly, after years of steady progress, that rate fell slightly in 2020 during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic when many police departments reduced traffic enforcement," the organisations say in a statement.

“This study reinforces the need for equitable traffic enforcement focused on the most dangerous driving behaviors,” said GHSA executive director Jonathan Adkins.

“Over the past two years, traffic enforcement has declined in many parts of the country while traffic deaths surged.”
 
The study also found that HVE campaigns focused on distracted driving, drink-driving and speeding led to a reduction in hand-held phone use, lower rates of drunk driving crashes and citations, and decreased speeds in workzones, respectively. 
 
“Enforcement alone will not solve the traffic safety crisis,” warns Adkins.

“We cannot simply enforce, build, design or educate our way out of this problem. The Safe System necessitates a comprehensive approach for achieving our collective goal of zero traffic deaths, including equitable enforcement that focuses on risky driver choices that endanger all road users.”

Related Content

  • US toll roads stable for 2014, says Fitch
    December 18, 2013
    Within a broader review of US transport infrastructure securities, including ports and airlines, Fitch Rating analysts say the recent slow growth in aggregate traffic is likely to continue but that many established toll roads look financially solid because of their pricing power - tolls that have been well below revenue maximising levels. Their pricing power has been somewhat reduced, Fitch says, by strong increases in toll rates on many toll roads, which mean they have less scope for big increases in to
  • Iteris sees red over US road deaths
    November 26, 2019
    Drivers who run red lights are killing more than two people per day in the US, says an AAA report. James Esquivel of Iteris sets out some practical ways in which this might be stopped
  • ETSC says road safety is ‘vicious circle’
    June 12, 2019
    Urban road safety is a key problem in Europe, an issue that needs to be addressed as a priority. That is the finding of a new report by the European Transport Safety Council (ETSC). The ETSC’s report reveals that road deaths on urban roads decreased at around half the rate of those on rural roads over the period 2010-2017. The report also shows that vulnerable road users such as pedestrians, cyclists and motorcyclists, account for 70% of those killed and seriously injured on urban roads. Dovilė Adminait
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t