Skip to main content

Visible enforcement makes roads safer: study

US research shows that high visibility is factor in reducing dangerous driving behaviours
By Adam Hill June 14, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
Drivers tend to behave better if they think police might see them (© Vilaimages | Dreamstime.com)

A study by the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has confirmed that when drivers can see police are on hand to enforce the laws of the road, safety improves.

The synthesis of existing research examined data across 80 studies on the relationship between high visibility enforcement (HVE) and safety outcomes.

It focused on seatbelt wearing, speeding and drunk, distracted and aggressive driving - and showed that seat belt use rates increase an average of 3.5 percentage points with an HVE campaign.

One additional checkpoint per 100,000 people per week increased the belt use rate by 0.76 percentage points, according to the analysis.

The study was conducted by the National Cooperative Research and Evaluation Program, a federal research initiative managed by NHTSA and Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA).

They say even relatively small increases in the belt use rate can translate to hundreds of lives saved: the federal 'Click It or Ticket' campaign has seen belt use rise from 58% in 1994 to more than 90% in 2020.

"But alarmingly, after years of steady progress, that rate fell slightly in 2020 during the first year of the Covid-19 pandemic when many police departments reduced traffic enforcement," the organisations say in a statement.

“This study reinforces the need for equitable traffic enforcement focused on the most dangerous driving behaviors,” said GHSA executive director Jonathan Adkins.

“Over the past two years, traffic enforcement has declined in many parts of the country while traffic deaths surged.”
 
The study also found that HVE campaigns focused on distracted driving, drink-driving and speeding led to a reduction in hand-held phone use, lower rates of drunk driving crashes and citations, and decreased speeds in workzones, respectively. 
 
“Enforcement alone will not solve the traffic safety crisis,” warns Adkins.

“We cannot simply enforce, build, design or educate our way out of this problem. The Safe System necessitates a comprehensive approach for achieving our collective goal of zero traffic deaths, including equitable enforcement that focuses on risky driver choices that endanger all road users.”

Related Content

  • Crash course in workzone safety
    April 26, 2021
    A vehicle crashing through a workzone is an ever-present risk. As US National Work Zone Awareness Week approaches, Alan Dron asks what chance there is of improving the situation
  • Commsignia's V2X OBU Lite set to protect vulnerable road users
    July 31, 2023
    Lightweight Vehicle to Everything device designed to be fitted to micromobility vehicles
  • Cross-border enforcement directive annulled, but remains in place
    May 12, 2014
    The European Court of Justice has stopped a directive designed to ease cross-border exchange of information adopted by the European Parliament and Council in October 2011. This directive sets up a procedure for the exchange of information between member states in relation to eight road traffic offences (speeding, non-use of a seat-belt, failing to stop at a red traffic light, drink-driving, driving under the influence of drugs, failing to wear a crash helmet, use of a forbidden lane and illegally using a m
  • New legal basis brings EU wide cross border enforcement
    February 25, 2015
    Pan-EU enforcement is set to become a reality after legislation is revised. In May 2014 the European Court of Justice ruled that European Directive 2011/82/EU, which came into force in November 2013 to facilitate the exchange of information between member states in relation to eight road traffic offences, had been set up on an incorrect legal basis. The regulations had been introduced under police cooperation rules on the prevention of crime, but the Court decided that the measures in the Directive do not c