Skip to main content

Survey – Americans support red light cameras

The long arm of the law these days is often in the form of a robotic camera that captures motorists who run red lights. But the cameras are not always popular. New Jersey is scheduled to discontinue use of red light cameras on 16 December, and several other cities and states are considering similar moves. Despite the controversy, a majority of Americans back the use of red light cameras, according to a new survey from FindLaw.com, the most popular legal information website. The FindLaw.com survey foun
December 16, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
The long arm of the law these days is often in the form of a robotic camera that captures motorists who run red lights. But the cameras are not always popular. New Jersey is scheduled to discontinue use of red light cameras on 16 December, and several other cities and states are considering similar moves.

Despite the controversy, a majority of Americans back the use of red light cameras, according to a new survey from FindLaw.com, the most popular legal information website.

The FindLaw.com survey found that 56 percent of Americans support the use of red light cameras, while 44 per cent oppose them.

Law enforcement and safety advocates say the devices are effective at catching violating motorists and enhance public safety at dangerous intersections. Opponents say the cameras are merely a means of enhancing a city's revenues from citations, and may actually decrease safety by scaring drivers into making sudden stops, causing rear-end collisions.

Last month, voters in Cleveland approved a measure banning red light cameras in the city. Several states and municipalities have adopted or are considering similar measures.

"Traffic laws vary considerably by state and municipality, and that includes the consequences of receiving a traffic citation," said Stephanie Rahlfs, attorney-editor at FindLaw.com. "Every state has a different 'points' system that assigns different values to various traffic law violations. In addition, receiving a citation can often impact your auto insurance rates and renewals. It's prudent to always be aware of the traffic laws in the particular city and state where you are driving."

Related Content

  • Jenoptik to present non-invasive enforcement systems
    September 7, 2016
    Jenoptik’s Traffic Solutions Division will use the ITS World Congress Melbourne to present a range of traffic enforcement systems which are active in Australia and around the world: the company aims to demonstrate how it is improving roads, journeys and communities with 30,000 cameras operational in over 80 countries and with 480 staff working on traffic solutions and more than 50 million plates read every day.
  • Heading the right way with Caltrans
    October 27, 2020
    Wrong-way collisions are relatively rare – but they are often head-on and fatal. After recent studies, California DoT is reviewing its highway design standards
  • Crash prevention systems improving rapidly says IIHS
    June 2, 2014
    According to its latest report, less than a year into a new Insurance |Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) ratings program for front crash prevention, auto manufacturers are making strides in adopting the most beneficial systems with automatic braking capabilities and are offering the features on a wider variety of models. Twenty-one of 24 cars and SUVs, all 2014 models unless noted, earn an advanced or higher rating in the latest round of IIHS evaluations. "We are already seeing improvements from automaker
  • Georgia, US, schools deploy school bus safety cameras
    August 8, 2014
    City Schools of Decatur will soon become the twelfth school district in Georgia, US, to deploy American Traffic Solutions’ (ATS) CrossingGuard technology to help school districts address the growing problem of illegal passing of school buses that are stopped and boarding or disembarking children.