Skip to main content

St Louis red light cameras changing driver behaviour

According to a new analysis of the City of St. Louis' violator-funded red-light safety camera program carried out by safety camera supplier American Traffic Systems (ATS), drivers are adopting safer driving habits by stopping at red lights. As drivers comply with the law, the risk of dangerous red-light running collisions is reduced, and streets become safer for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. The study reviewed nearly 350,000 red-light running violations issued in the city from the time the program bega
November 5, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
According to a new analysis of the City of St. Louis' violator-funded red-light safety camera program carried out by safety camera supplier 6826 American Traffic Systems (ATS), drivers are adopting safer driving habits by stopping at red lights. As drivers comply with the law, the risk of dangerous red-light running collisions is reduced, and streets become safer for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists.

The study reviewed nearly 350,000 red-light running violations issued in the city from the time the program began in February 2007 to August 2012 and found nearly four out of every five drivers (nearly 80 per cent) who received one ticket did not get a second. Only 15 per cent of drivers received two violations. This low rate of recidivism indicates drivers are getting the message authorities are sending through red-light safety cameras.

So far in the program's lifetime, the number of red-light running violations has decreased on average 55 per cent at all locations, with reductions as high as 87 per cent at some of the locations where cameras were first installed.

Red light safety cameras allow the police to expand their ability to enforce traffic laws over a wider area while focusing their efforts on more violent crimes. Red-light safety camera video has also provided evidence to help investigate non-traffic related crimes. The program analysis found that the St. Louis Police Department requested video from red-light cameras on more than 70 occasions to help with the investigation of carjacking offences, attempted rape, shooting, robberies, homicides and simple accident reconstruction. Video from the red light cameras also helped in the investigation of the hit and run driver who killed St. Louis City Police Officer David Haynes in 2010. The requests are also referenced in police reports and entered into evidence to satisfy conflicting testimony.

St. Louis also receives economic benefits from red-light cameras. The program is 10 per cent funded by violators and not taxpayers. Every traffic crash exacts a financial cost on families, vehicles owners and the community at large. With every averted traffic crash, a community realises a savings in medical costs, emergency services expenses and other costs. According to a 2012 study by John Dunham and Associates, the use of one red-light safety camera in St. Louis saves the community an average of US$174,422 annually as a result of fewer traffic crashes.

ATS' study results are not unique to St. Louis. Independent studies have gone further and quantified the number of lives saved and crashes avoided. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety in 2011 found fourteen cities with red-light cameras experienced a 24 percent reduction in red-light running fatalities. Also that year, a Texas Transportation Institute study found right-angle crashes, the most life-threatening type of red-light running collisions, decreased 32 percent at intersections with red-light safety cameras.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Front crash prevention slashes police-reported rear-end crashes, says IIHS
    January 29, 2016
    Vehicles equipped with front crash prevention are much less likely to rear-end other vehicles, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS) has found in the first study of the feature's effectiveness using US police-reported crash data. The study found that systems with automatic braking reduce rear-end crashes by about 40 per cent on average, while forward collision warning alone cuts them by 23 per cent. The automatic braking systems also greatly reduce injury crashes.
  • IAM RoadSmart: high profile policing and consistent sentencing need to back up life time sentences for drivers who kill
    October 17, 2017
    IAM RoadSmart (IRS) has welcomed the new UK government legislation that could issue life sentences to drivers who cause death by speeding, street racing or while a mobile phone, or under the influence of drink or drugs. However, the road safety charity warned that high profile policing and consistent jail sentences are also needed to tackle reckless driving that kills.
  • Automatic speed enforcement in Finland
    February 1, 2012
    In 2004, Finland extended its automatic speed enforcement from 280 to 800 road kilometres. Risto Öörni of the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, explains the costs and the benefits. Automatic speed enforcement in Finland is operated by the police and is based on cameras installed on poles along main roads and mobile semi-automatic speed enforcement units installed in police cars.
  • Road offence cameras installed in 102 Georgia school buses
    April 17, 2012
    A total of 102 school buses in Cobb County, Georgia have been installed with digital video cameras to capture number plate information of drivers who refuse to stop when a school bus is unloading or loading children. The district has 1,188 buses and almost 10 per cent of that total will be equipped with the $200 cameras. Those who violate the law will face a fine of $300 for an initial offence. For a third offence within five years, the fine would increase to $1,000. The cost for the cameras will be covered