Skip to main content

London mayor re-elected despite ULEZ expansion opposition

Sadiq Khan won third term even though opponents said clean air measure was unpopular
By Adam Hill May 7, 2024 Read time: 2 mins
Sadiq Khan is beginning third term as London mayor (© Smutkoalex | Dreamstime.com)

London's ultra-low emission zone (ULEZ) expansion has been a contentious issue in the UK capital - but it was not enough to stop the city's mayor from being re-elected for a historic third term.

Sadiq Khan was behind the £140m expansion of the ULEZ in August 2023, which saw it more than quadruple from 380km2 (147 sq miles) to 1,579km2 (610 sq miles), encompassing all 32 London boroughs.

Khan's main challenger, Conservative candidate Susan Hall, had promised to reverse the ULEZ expansion 'on day one' if she had been elected London mayor instead.

The Conservatives are the ruling party in the UK nationally, and have decried measures such as ULEZ expansion as part of a 'war on motorists'.

However, Khan (part of the national opposition Labour party) was re-elected in London with an 11 percentage point gap between him and Hall, a victory celebrated by prominent campaigners on urban mobility and decarbonisation.

Janette Sadik-Khan, former New York City Department of Transportation commissioner, posted on X: "Yes we Khan! For all the politicians who think that running against low-emission zones and low-traffic neighbourhoods will win votes, Sadiq Khan's election to a third term as London's mayor is a message that it's time to look for another issue."

Carlos Moreno, professor at IAE-Paris Sorbonne and 15-minute city advocate, posted on X: "Democracy has spoken: despite the violent attacks on the ULEZ, LTN [low-traffic neighbourhoods], 15-minute city, the car-friendly Conservatives suffered their worst defeat for a long time... Cities want to be more healthy and green with a happy proximity."

Transport for London insists that data shows "95% of vehicles overall seen driving in London on an average day now comply with ULEZ emissions standards".

In other words, while opposition to ULEZ has at times been vociferous, the vast majority of drivers do not have to pay the £12.50 daily fee anyway.

However, the UK Daily Telegraph reported that so-called 'blade runners', who have been attacking camera and traffic signal infrastructure, cut down ULEZ camera poles hours after Khan's re-election on Saturday afternoon.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Austria issues highest fines for violation of diesel bans, says study
    January 31, 2019
    Austria imposes the highest fines in Europe for violating diesel bans and low-emission zones, according to new research. Austrian authorities charge up to €2,180 for violators – the next highest is the UK, with fines up to £1,138. Auto parts company Kfzteile24 based its findings on data from UrbanAccessRegulations.eu and its map offers a comparison between 350 cities across Europe. The overview outlines examples of vehicles already affected by low-emission zones and driving diesel bans - and those likel
  • Paris votes to hike SUV parking charges
    February 5, 2024
    Fees to park larger vehicles on French capital's streets will treble following referendum
  • Investors say politics is hurting Chile infrastructure spending
    October 22, 2013
    While the financial community praises Chile as a safe haven and pioneer in Latin American infrastructure, investors say that political leaders lack commitment to push for projects, and they have called for the creation of an independent authority to plan public works and coordinate projects. Chile's construction chamber has proposed the installation of an agency, such as those that exist in Canada and New Zealand, which would be independent from the national government and would plan long-term infrastruc
  • New services and equipment helps cities tackle air quality issues
    September 19, 2017
    With poor urban air quality shortening lives and fines being imposed for breaching pollution limits, authorities are seeking ways to clean up their cities. Poor air quality is topping the agenda for city authorities across the globe. In the UK, for example, a report from the Royal Colleges of Physicians and of Paediatrics and Child Health, concluded that poor outdoor air quality shortens the lives of around 40,000 people a year – principally by undermining the health of people with heart and/or lung prob