Skip to main content

IRU report: Money is ‘barrier’ to road safety

Road safety is being compromised due to lack of money, according to new research by IRU.
By Adam Hill February 20, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
IRU report: cost is barrier to road safety © Anriphoto | Dreamstime.com

The international road transport organisation surveyed mobility companies and logistics providers in Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and found that lack of cash was stopping them from investing in technology to make their vehicles – buses, trucks and coaches - safer.

The report, Driving Road Safety Innovation, says: “Overwhelmingly, for operators across Europe, financial challenges pose the biggest barrier to investment, with both a lack of sufficient financial resources and a perceived low cost-benefit ratio presenting significant obstacles.”

The survey says 22% of mobility operators and 19% of logistics firms cite finance as their “primary barrier”. This is a “particular constraint” in some regions: 30% of respondents in eastern Europe and 25% in the CIS say they “lack the financial resources to invest in vehicle technology”. 

Another major problem highlighted in the survey is the “perceived low cost-benefit ratio” felt by companies. Other barriers include technological know-how (73% of respondents cite this), human resource levels for implementation and availability of practical solutions. 

“Transport operators also feel that resistance to change from their drivers and workers to human and operational related investments, in comparison to vehicle related investment, is a particular challenge,” the report finds.
However, in what seems to be a textbook example of cognitive dissonance – the ability to hold two conflicting positions at the same time - operators across the board cite investments in vehicle technology “as a number one priority for safety”. In other words, they see that such investment is vital - just not in their specific case.

However, to add to the murky picture, 85% of operators “have significant safety investments planned in the near future” – and 96% of operators say investing in safety “is key to their company’s future success”.

IRU suggests that “the high upfront costs of vehicle technology may be deterring operators from making safety investments, and that more needs to be done by manufacturers and technology providers to offer more affordable and accessible safety solutions”. 

There also appears to be an issue with certification: 93% of operators “want increased international standards on technical vehicle safety equipment”.

“For an industry built on transporting people, there is an important need to overcome these barriers so that safety investments continue to advance,” the report says. “Travelling by bus or coach is already one of the safest forms of transport, but more needs to be done to support and incentivise mobility companies to continue investing in safety in a sustainable way.”

The report concludes that policymakers at national and local level must work with the private sector “to create well-targeted incentives and an environment in which mobility  operators are able to afford to make the investments needed to protect drivers, passengers and road users, now and in the future”.

The United Nations says that 3,500 people are killed on the world’s roads every day. 

IRU says commercial vehicles are involved in less than 3% of road accidents - 85% of which are caused by human error (25% due to the professional driver, 75% due to the other road user). 
 

Related Content

  • November 13, 2012
    'Conservatism hampering ITS technical evolution'
    Nick Lanigan, managing director of Clearview Traffic, considers the current outlook in the ITS sector from an SME's perspective. Interview with Jason Barnes. When times are hard, businesses can invest or cut. Either way, they need guidance from customers – governments – on where best to concentrate their efforts. Prolonged economic slowdown is currently an issue. A short recession, however sharp, would have left many industry players able to ride the bow-wave of governments’ multi-year spending on strategic
  • May 16, 2018
    ACE report: private sector and user-pay for English roads
    It’s one minute to midnight for funding England’s roads, according to a timely new report - and the clock’s big hand is pointing to some form of user-pay solution, reports David Arminas. Is there any way out of future user-pay funding for England’s highway infrastructure? The answer is a resounding ‘no’, according to the recently-published report Funding Roads for the Future. The 25-page document by the London-based Association for Consultancy and Engineering (ACE) calls for a radical rethink about how to
  • January 16, 2012
    Dutch survey shows drivers are in favour of road user charging
    'Keep it simple, stupid' is an oft-forgotten axiom but in terms of road user charging it is entirely appropriate. So says the ANWB's Ferry Smith. A couple of decades ago, it might have been largely true that the technology aspects of advanced road infrastructure were the main obstacles to deployment. However, 20 years or more of development have led to a situation where such 'obstacles' are often no more than a political fig-leaf. Area-wide Road User Charging (RUC) is a case in point; speak candidly to syst
  • December 4, 2012
    ITS World Congress debates perceptions of enforcement
    The technical programme of this year’s ITS World Congress in Vienna includes a special session on the image of enforcement. ITS International examines the scale of the problem and what can be done about it. Debate on the merits and difficulties of enforcing speed limits appears centred on a conflict of principles. Put very simply, local communities, people living close to busy or hazardous roads, want to see traffic speeds calmed. Drivers on those roads, on the whole, want their principle of freedom to be m