Skip to main content

IRU report: Money is ‘barrier’ to road safety

Road safety is being compromised due to lack of money, according to new research by IRU.
By Adam Hill February 20, 2020 Read time: 3 mins
IRU report: cost is barrier to road safety © Anriphoto | Dreamstime.com

The international road transport organisation surveyed mobility companies and logistics providers in Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) and found that lack of cash was stopping them from investing in technology to make their vehicles – buses, trucks and coaches - safer.

The report, Driving Road Safety Innovation, says: “Overwhelmingly, for operators across Europe, financial challenges pose the biggest barrier to investment, with both a lack of sufficient financial resources and a perceived low cost-benefit ratio presenting significant obstacles.”

The survey says 22% of mobility operators and 19% of logistics firms cite finance as their “primary barrier”. This is a “particular constraint” in some regions: 30% of respondents in eastern Europe and 25% in the CIS say they “lack the financial resources to invest in vehicle technology”. 

Another major problem highlighted in the survey is the “perceived low cost-benefit ratio” felt by companies. Other barriers include technological know-how (73% of respondents cite this), human resource levels for implementation and availability of practical solutions. 

“Transport operators also feel that resistance to change from their drivers and workers to human and operational related investments, in comparison to vehicle related investment, is a particular challenge,” the report finds.
However, in what seems to be a textbook example of cognitive dissonance – the ability to hold two conflicting positions at the same time - operators across the board cite investments in vehicle technology “as a number one priority for safety”. In other words, they see that such investment is vital - just not in their specific case.

However, to add to the murky picture, 85% of operators “have significant safety investments planned in the near future” – and 96% of operators say investing in safety “is key to their company’s future success”.

IRU suggests that “the high upfront costs of vehicle technology may be deterring operators from making safety investments, and that more needs to be done by manufacturers and technology providers to offer more affordable and accessible safety solutions”. 

There also appears to be an issue with certification: 93% of operators “want increased international standards on technical vehicle safety equipment”.

“For an industry built on transporting people, there is an important need to overcome these barriers so that safety investments continue to advance,” the report says. “Travelling by bus or coach is already one of the safest forms of transport, but more needs to be done to support and incentivise mobility companies to continue investing in safety in a sustainable way.”

The report concludes that policymakers at national and local level must work with the private sector “to create well-targeted incentives and an environment in which mobility  operators are able to afford to make the investments needed to protect drivers, passengers and road users, now and in the future”.

The United Nations says that 3,500 people are killed on the world’s roads every day. 

IRU says commercial vehicles are involved in less than 3% of road accidents - 85% of which are caused by human error (25% due to the professional driver, 75% due to the other road user). 
 

Related Content

  • Foundation funds research for informed campaigning
    April 29, 2015
    ITS International talks to Professor Stephen Glaister, director of the transport research and lobbying organisation, the RAC Foundation. It is through the eyes of an economist that Professor Stephen Glaister, emeritus professor of transport and infrastructure at Imperial College London and director of the RAC Foundation, views current and future transport problems. Having spent 30 years at the London School of Economics and another 10 at Imperial, the move to the RAC Foundation was a radical departure from
  • Lidar: beginning to see the light
    March 14, 2022
    Lidar feels like a technology whose time has come – but why now? Adam Hill talks to manufacturers, vendors and system integrators in the sector to assess the state of play and to find out what comes next
  • APA supports automated work zone speed enforcement
    July 17, 2015
    A trade association representing the highway construction industry strongly supports automated enforcement of speed limits in work zones and Maryland's experience with a similarly designed program has had very good results, the association head has told a joint Pennsylvania House and Senate committee. According to PennDOT, 24 people were killed in work-zone crashes in 2014, eight more than in 2013. Additionally, there were 1,841 crashes in work zones last year, a slight decrease from the 1,851 crashes
  • Asecap Days 2024: Getting used to the new normal
    August 27, 2024
    Asecap Days 2024 in Milan focused on environmental protection of road infrastructure, digital twin-based maintenance and monitoring of highways as well as the impact of electric vehicles, reports David Arminas