Skip to main content

Iowa DOT to set rules for automated traffic enforcement

The Iowa Department of Transportation has developed proposed administrative rules to govern implementation and placement of automated traffic enforcement systems on the primary highway system. The proposed rules will cover both fixed and mobile speed and red light enforcement camera systems. Adoption of rules for automated traffic enforcement will provide local governmental agencies with a defined process for documenting a critical traffic safety issue at a specific location and implementing the warrant
October 3, 2013 Read time: 2 mins
The 7511 Iowa Department of Transportation has developed proposed administrative rules to govern implementation and placement of automated traffic enforcement systems on the primary highway system.  The proposed rules will cover both fixed and mobile speed and red light enforcement camera systems.

Adoption of rules for automated traffic enforcement will provide local governmental agencies with a defined process for documenting a critical traffic safety issue at a specific location and implementing the warranted traffic safety solution(s). Paul Trombino, Iowa DOT director said, “Our belief is that automatic traffic enforcement systems should be used as a last resort after other safety measures have been exhausted.

“Safety on Iowa’s transportation system is the Iowa DOT’s number one priority. Automated traffic enforcement systems need to be implemented in ways that enhance safety on the roadways. The rules will ensure placement does not cause unnecessary distractions or obstructions for motorists that could cause unsafe situations.”

Related Content

  • October 26, 2016
    Building the case for photo enforcement
    As red light enforcement is returning to some intersections and being shut down at others, new evidence has been released backing the safety campaigners, reports Jon Masters. In 2014, 709 Americans were killed in red-light-running crashes and an estimated 126,000 were injured according to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS).
  • October 23, 2015
    Negative report for road safety cameras
    An audit of the state’s speed cameras has found that the Queensland Police Service (QPS) and the Department of Transport and Main Roads (TMR) in Australia have strayed from best practice in using the devices to reduce speeding, with a resultant effect on road safety, according to PSNews online. In his report Road Safety: Traffic Cameras, Acting Auditor-General, Anthony Close found that in the past seven years the QPS had issued 3,760,962 speeding tickets from camera-based evidence, with TMR collecting AU
  • November 10, 2015
    Benefits of traffic data sharing with app developers
    Timothy Compston finds out if exchanging traffic and road condition data with private app developers makes sense for both drivers and road authorities. Much has been said about the potential benefits for authorities in sharing data with traffic and navigation app developers, and receiving ‘crowdsourced’ information in return – so how is it working in practice?
  • June 5, 2014
    The twisting path to enforcement’s future
    Survey reveals some division of views about enforcement’s future as Colin Sowman discovers. Technological advances and legislative changes pose many questions for those involved in road enforcement, ranging from the changing demands of privacy and data protection legislation to the practicalities on multi-speed enforcement. So to get the industry’s views ITS International took soundings on some of these bigger questions. In a world where many vehicles are fitted with GPS linked ‘black box’ telematics system