Skip to main content

Health researchers: ‘Cut speed limit during pandemic’

Health researchers have urged the UK government to reduce the road speed limit during the coronavirus pandemic.
By Adam Hill April 7, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Cutting speed limits to 20mph in UK would help free up pandemic treatment resources, say researchers

Their logic is that this will help to cut the number of people who need hospital treatment following traffic accidents. 

In turn, they say, this “bold and creative leadership” from the government would free up resources for the country’s National Health Service to treat patients who have Covid-19. 

“We therefore suggest that the government urgently explore an emergency reduction of all national speed limits to 50mph, and to 20mph in urban areas,” the five researchers write on BMJ.com.

The article notes the UK’s policy – in line with many other countries – of ‘flattening the curve’ of the epidemic so that acute healthcare services are not overwhelmed, and of scaling up intensive care capacity.

But the researchers wonder if authorities are “missing a trick by not also working to lower the baseline demands placed on the NHS”.

The article points to evidence that lowering speed limits can lead to major reductions in injuries: “In Canada, for example, lowering the speed limit from 40km/h to 30km/h was associated with a 28% decrease in pedestrian-motor vehicle collisions and a 67% decrease in major and fatal injuries.”

It adds that, in England alone, there are 35,000 non-fatal hospital admissions related to crashes each year, more than one in 10 of which are “likely to require intensive support, including anaesthesia and surgery”.

The UK is already under strict social distancing measures, and the research says the speed limit cut could be incorporated into government guidance. 

“We expect that the public would support this proposal for a limited time period if it was communicated appropriately in relation to the current NHS emergency,” the article concludes.
 

Related Content

  • The downside of driverless vehicles
    October 27, 2016
    Driverless cars will have a detrimental effect on congestion and security while the road safety benefits can be achieved sooner and cheaper using ADAS, argues Colin Sowman. Many Governments are consulting about the introduction of driverless vehicles and even running trials. As 70% or 80% of crashes are caused by human error, the promise of a crash-free future of driverless, self-driving or autonomous vehicles (call them what you will) is alluring, as are the claims of reduced congestion and lower emissions
  • TransLink trials 'virus-killing' copper on transit
    November 27, 2020
    Vancouver transport network's four-week trial aimed at improving Covid hygiene
  • Give offending drivers credit for good behaviour
    July 27, 2012
    Andrew Rooke and Dave Marples of Technolution B.V. take a look at what can be done to address a long-standing problem: the all-or-nothing approach of automated enforcement. To start, a brief history of speeding: on 14 November 1896, the first Veteran Car Run was staged in England from London to Brighton. It was organised to celebrate new British legislation to raise the maximum speed of vehicles from four to 14mph while also removing the need for a person waving a red flag to walk in front of the car and wa
  • Visible enforcement makes roads safer: study
    June 14, 2022
    US research shows that high visibility is factor in reducing dangerous driving behaviours