Skip to main content

GHSA warns of racism in traffic enforcement

'No highway safety programme can survive without public trust,' it says
By Adam Hill September 28, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
GHSA is picking up on concerns highlighted by the Black Lives Matter movement (© Walter Arce | Dreamstime.com)

The US Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) has warned that the deaths of Black drivers after they have been stopped by police are at risk of undermining more general road safety messages.

The organisation has sent out a strong message abhorring racism, and says that public trust in road safety campaigns could be undermined if drivers think that racism is a factor in traffic enforcement. 

"GHSA vehemently condemns racism in all its forms," says GHSA executive director Jonathan Adkins.

"Race, religion, sexual orientation or any other unique characteristic should never be the reason for a traffic stop, consciously or unconsciously, nor should these characteristics be used to determine who to ticket, who to test, who to search or who to arrest."

Calling traffic deaths a US "public health crisis" (36,560 people were killed in 2018), Adkins says: "Deaths that are unjustified and tragic that occur at the hands of law enforcement, potentially involving traffic enforcement, remind us that excessive force, disparate treatment, and individual and systematic racism in policing threaten public safety and roadway safety."

He adds: "No highway safety programme can survive without public trust." 

"The law enforcement community is not exempt from the bias, prejudice and racism that have a long history in our nation. The persistence of these behaviours negatively impacts all Americans, including the honourable and professional law enforcement officers in our communities."
 
While emphasising its support for enforcement efforts, GHSA has come up with a package of recommendations to address the issue.

These include a plea for politicians and planners "to prioritise and incorporate perspectives from minorities, low-income communities and all others impacted by highway safety planning".

It also supports initiatives to collect and report standardised data about race in traffic enforcement, and encourages research to more effectively collect and analyse this information so it can be used for highway safety planning and law enforcement grant funding decisions.

As well as encouraging steps to root out bias, GHSA points out that enforcement organisations "should strive to ensure agency demographics are commensurate with the communities they serve".

It concludes: "While GHSA urges reform, we continue to support the proven role of traffic enforcement and the wider criminal justice system to prevent crashes, deaths and injuries; stop dangerous driving; and hold drivers accountable for poor, often deadly, choices."

Related Content

  • May 7, 2025
    US Automated Vehicle Framework to 'slash red tape'
    NHTSA insists safety will be prioritised and 'unnecessary' regulation removed
  • July 11, 2016
    Nine in 10 people want tougher sentences for drivers who kill
    A study to mark the launch of Brake’s new Roads to Justice Campaign shows there is huge support for strengthening both the charges and sentences faced by criminal drivers. Ninety-one per cent of people questioned agreed that if someone causes a fatal crash when they get behind the wheel after drinking or taking drugs, they should be charged with manslaughter. That carries a possible life sentence. At present people can either be charged with causing death by dangerous driving or causing death by careless
  • March 18, 2020
    VRU safety report urges enforcement
    Enforcement must be at the heart of a drive to reduce vulnerable road user deaths and injuries, says the latest report from the European Transport Safety Council. Its facts and figures give authorities the justification to invest more in camera technology and other ITS solutions
  • February 26, 2021
    GHSA report highlights distracted driving
    Evaluation still needed in US to determine effectiveness of in-vehicle phone use laws