Skip to main content

GHSA warns of racism in traffic enforcement

'No highway safety programme can survive without public trust,' it says
By Adam Hill September 28, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
GHSA is picking up on concerns highlighted by the Black Lives Matter movement (© Walter Arce | Dreamstime.com)

The US Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) has warned that the deaths of Black drivers after they have been stopped by police are at risk of undermining more general road safety messages.

The organisation has sent out a strong message abhorring racism, and says that public trust in road safety campaigns could be undermined if drivers think that racism is a factor in traffic enforcement. 

"GHSA vehemently condemns racism in all its forms," says GHSA executive director Jonathan Adkins.

"Race, religion, sexual orientation or any other unique characteristic should never be the reason for a traffic stop, consciously or unconsciously, nor should these characteristics be used to determine who to ticket, who to test, who to search or who to arrest."

Calling traffic deaths a US "public health crisis" (36,560 people were killed in 2018), Adkins says: "Deaths that are unjustified and tragic that occur at the hands of law enforcement, potentially involving traffic enforcement, remind us that excessive force, disparate treatment, and individual and systematic racism in policing threaten public safety and roadway safety."

He adds: "No highway safety programme can survive without public trust." 

"The law enforcement community is not exempt from the bias, prejudice and racism that have a long history in our nation. The persistence of these behaviours negatively impacts all Americans, including the honourable and professional law enforcement officers in our communities."
 
While emphasising its support for enforcement efforts, GHSA has come up with a package of recommendations to address the issue.

These include a plea for politicians and planners "to prioritise and incorporate perspectives from minorities, low-income communities and all others impacted by highway safety planning".

It also supports initiatives to collect and report standardised data about race in traffic enforcement, and encourages research to more effectively collect and analyse this information so it can be used for highway safety planning and law enforcement grant funding decisions.

As well as encouraging steps to root out bias, GHSA points out that enforcement organisations "should strive to ensure agency demographics are commensurate with the communities they serve".

It concludes: "While GHSA urges reform, we continue to support the proven role of traffic enforcement and the wider criminal justice system to prevent crashes, deaths and injuries; stop dangerous driving; and hold drivers accountable for poor, often deadly, choices."

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • Section speed enforcements gains global converts
    October 26, 2017
    As the benefits of section speed enforcement are becoming clearer, the technology is gaining converts worldwide. Colin Sowman reports. America’s National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) is calling for urgent action from both road authorities and the federal government to combat speeding which has been identified as one of the most common factors in motor vehicle crashes in the United States. This new call follows the publication of a safety study which found that between 2005 through 2014, 31% of all
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t
  • Hikvision maximises safety with smart video technology
    September 12, 2022
    Around the world, thousands of people are injured or killed in road traffic accidents every day. To maximise safety for motorists and other road users, cities and highways authorities are implementing smart video solutions that alert emergency teams when an accident occurs in real time – supporting faster responses and potentially saving lives, says Juan Sádaba, ITS business development manager at Hikvision Spain