Skip to main content

Get most dangerous drivers off Europe’s roads, say police chiefs

As part of its support for the European target of halving road deaths by 2020, Tispol will use its annual Conference in Manchester on 6 and 7 October to call for better protection of vulnerable road users, with greater efforts to rid Europe’s roads of the most dangerous drivers. Senior police officers, academics, policy makers and other road safety professionals will consider a range of specific issues during the two-day conference, including: Safer driving in later life; Fatigue in emergency service dr
October 5, 2015 Read time: 2 mins
As part of its support for the European target of halving road deaths by 2020, 650 Tispol will use its annual Conference in Manchester on 6 and 7 October to call for better protection of vulnerable road users, with greater efforts to rid Europe’s roads of the most dangerous drivers.
 
Senior police officers, academics, policy makers and other road safety professionals will consider a range of specific issues during the two-day conference, including: Safer driving in later life; Fatigue in emergency service drivers; Police strategies to reduce motorcycle casualties; Safer cycle commuter journeys Women drivers, alcohol and increased vulnerability.

Other conference messages include: Road safety targets are good - they unite all those groups working to reduce death and injury on Europe’s roads; Tispol wants to see political will restored across Europe, and a commitment from governments to avoid any further cuts to policing resources, which will allow police officers to enforce existing laws, investigate collisions effectively, and identify and sanction the most dangerous drivers; The result will be significant and sustained reductions in road deaths and injuries.
 
Tispol President Aidan Reid comments: “Traffic police have a vital role to play in reducing deaths and serious injuries on the roads of Europe. Central to this is the task of identifying and sanctioning those drivers who pose unacceptably high risks. They may be disqualified, uninsured, or simply have a flagrant disregard for the rules of the road which are there to help keep everyone safe.

“Robust systems are in place to deal with high-end offenders, but there needs to be effective enforcement and consistent, tough sentencing in order to provide a worthwhile deterrent.”

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Canada puts $2.5m into tackling drug-impaired driving
    August 21, 2019
    The government of Canada is investing CAN$2.5 million over five years to tackle drug-impaired driving in the province of Prince Edward Island. The move is part of a CAN$81 million package to support public and road safety activities. Funding will help train more police officers in standardised field sobriety testing and drug recognition expert evaluation. The money will also be used to purchase approved drug screening devices and develop standardised data collection and reporting practices to analyse
  • Funding secured for TRL’s Data Sustains Life project
    January 30, 2025
    Research body will collaborate on collision data to improve road safety
  • Bristol trials new cycle safety technology
    June 9, 2014
    As part of an ongoing trial funded by five West of England local authorities, UK bus operator First West of England will for the first time be test driving state-of-the-art cycle safety technology on two of its buses on the busy Gloucester Road route in the city of Bristol. Developed by Fusion Processing, CycleEye technology aims to reduce the growing number of cyclist collisions and casualties across the country involving large commercial vehicles. CycleEye is fitted to the side of the vehicle and
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t