Skip to main content

European Commission: tighter rules for safer/cleaner cars

The European Commission (EC), European Parliament and the Council have reached a political agreement on the commission proposal from January 2016 to raise the quality level and independence of type-approval and testing before a car is placed on the market. It would enable the EC to be able to initiate EU-wide recalls and impose penalties on manufacturers or technical services of up to €30,000 (£26,000) per non-compliant car.
December 12, 2017 Read time: 3 mins
The 1690 European Commission (EC), European Parliament and the Council have reached a political agreement on the %$Linker: 2 External <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-16"?><dictionary /> 0 0 0 link-external commission proposal from January 2016 false http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-16-167_en.htm false false%> to raise the quality level and independence of type-approval and testing before a car is placed on the market. It would enable the EC to be able to initiate EU-wide recalls and impose penalties on manufacturers or technical services of up to €30,000 (£26,000) per non-compliant car.


These rules would enforce Member States to carry out regular spot-checks on vehicles already on their market with results made publicly available. In addition, all Member States would be able to immediately take safeguard measures against non-compliant vehicles on their territory without having to wait for the authority that issued the type-approval to act.

Under the proposal, technical services would be regularly and independently audited as part of stringent performance criteria to obtain and maintain their designation by a Member State for testing and inspecting new car models. The EC and Member States would also be able to challenge a designation when something is wrong.

National type-approval authorities would be subject to Commission audits to ensure that the relevant rules are implemented and enforced across the EU.

In the future, the EC will be able to lead a new enforcement forum to ensure uniformity in the interpretation of relevant EU legislation, transparency of non-compliance and more coordinated market surveillance activities by Member States.

Car manufacturers will also have to provide access to the vehicle’s software tools protocols which go in hand with the Real Driving Emissions package to disclose their emissions reductions strategies.

This preliminary political agreement is now subject to formal approval by the European Parliament and Council. It will then become mandatory for all Member States on 1 September 2020.

Elżbieta Bieńkowska, commissioner responsible for Internal Market, Industry, Entrepreneurship and SMEs, said: "Dieselgate has revealed the weaknesses of our regulatory and market surveillance system. We know that some car manufacturers were cheating and many others were exploiting loopholes. To put an end to this, we are overhauling the whole system. After almost two years of negotiations, I welcome that the key elements of our proposal have been upheld, including real EU oversight and enforcement powers. In the future, the Commission will be able to carry out checks on cars, trigger EU-wide recalls, and impose fines of up to €30,000 per car when the law is broken."

8054 FIA Region I director general, Laurianne Krid, responded to the new legislation: “Improving the vehicle type approval process is essential to avoid another dieselgate and to restore consumer confidence in the vehicles that they drive. Although today’s compromise is not perfect, we support stronger market surveillance requirements which should help steer car makers to achieve emissions targets in the real world and not just in the laboratory.”

‘With more and more cars becoming connected, the Commission and Member States now have to look at how independent operators, like our members, can be assured that they will get full and fair access to vehicle information. This is essential so that independent operators cannot only test cars properly but also provide key services to motorists both now and in the future”, Krid added.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Uber’s self-driving cars resume trials in Pittsburgh in manual mode
    July 27, 2018
    Uber’s self-driving cars are being manually driven on public roads in Pittsburgh after a fatal crash which prompted the company to pull out of its testing programme in North America. The company is trialling new safeguards which it says will improve vehicle fleet safety and performance. According to a report by Medium, Eric Meyhofer, head of Uber Advanced Technologies, says: “While we are eager to resume testing of our self-driving system, we see manual driving as an important first step in piloting thes
  • MTC approves e-tolling upgrade for Bay Area bridges
    September 23, 2019
    The Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) intends to replace cash lanes with the electronic FasTrak tolling system at seven bridges in the San Francisco Bay Area. A report by Fox 2 KTVU says the MTC is hoping the $4 million upgrade will speed up traffic flow and save money on operations on the following bridges: Carquinez, Antioch, Benicia, Richmond-San Rafael, San Francisco-Oakland Bay, San Mateo and Dumbarton. For drivers without a FasTrak system, cameras will capture the number plates of their v
  • London conference looks to MaaS future
    March 16, 2017
    Transportation experts from across the globe converge on London for ITS International’s MaaS-Market Conference on 22 and 23 March. Reading international transport and technology experts will gather at a major conference in London next month to debate a revolutionary overhaul of their transport systems by developing Mobility as a Service – or MaaS – operations.
  • Transport policy doesn’t operate in a vacuum
    April 7, 2014
    Intertraffic offers traffic planners and other transportation professionals the opportunity to view and find out about the latest cutting-edge technology in the market. Behind the scenes, engineers have been working away to solve the technical problems traffic planners are facing and some they didn’t even know they had. Indeed it seems the technology is now available for authorities to do almost anything: to detect, select, identify, measure, charge, prosecute, influence and inform the travelling public.