Skip to main content

Enforcement triples in CVSA’s operation safe driver

Officers working as part of the US Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s (CSVA) Operation Safe Driver pulled over 74,765 during the weeklong enforcement blitz in October, nearly three times the 2012 figure, the group said. Of those, 29,048 drivers were in trucks or buses, while the rest were in passenger vehicles, CVSA said in a statement on 9 January. Car drivers were cited or warned for speeding 56 per cent of the time they were pulled over during the enforcement effort, compared with just 7.3 per ce
January 10, 2014 Read time: 2 mins
Officers working as part of the US Commercial Vehicle Safety Alliance’s (CSVA) Operation Safe Driver pulled over 74,765 during the weeklong enforcement blitz in October, nearly three times the 2012 figure, the group said.

Of those, 29,048 drivers were in trucks or buses, while the rest were in passenger vehicles, CVSA said in a statement on 9 January.

Car drivers were cited or warned for speeding 56 per cent of the time they were pulled over during the enforcement effort, compared with just 7.3 per cent of commercial drivers. Speeding was the most common citation or warnings for both classes of driver, followed by failure to use a seat belt and ignoring traffic control devices, CVSA said. The percentage of drivers cited or warned for speeding and seat belt use declined in both driver categories.

“Operation Safe Driver continues to increase its impact each year in targeting problem behaviour by all drivers, whether they drive a passenger car or a CMV, and by taking action on those who need it,” CVSA president Thomas Fuller from the New York State Police said. “We will continue to grow our enforcement and outreach efforts until we can eliminate the driving behaviour that has been shown to cause or contribute to crashes involving large trucks and buses.”

Related Content

  • March 6, 2015
    The effectiveness of roads policing
    The Joint Roads Policing Unit of Thames Valley Police and Hampshire Constabulary in the UK commissioned the Transport Research laboratory (TRL) to evaluate the effectiveness of their roads policing strategy in terms of reducing the number of people killed and seriously injured in road collisions. The focus was on the fatal four causes of collisions: speeding, drink-driving, not wearing a seat belt and drivers using mobile phones. TRL carried out a detailed literature review, in-depth review and analysis of
  • January 30, 2012
    Road design as a primary aid to speed enforcement?
    Letty Aarts, senior researcher, SWOV institute for road safety research, the Netherlands, discusses how road design can act as a primary aid to speed enforcement
  • February 1, 2012
    Growth of legislation in favour of US enforcement market
    The automated road safety enforcement industry in the United States had a very robust 2010. The industry continued to grow to the point that providers now have nearly 5,000 cameras deployed in 25 of the 50 states and the District of Columbia, with more than 650 communities utilising such life-saving technology. Intersection safety cameras are the most common application but more communities are also implementing road safety camera programmes to deter excessive speeding. Deploying cameras to protect children
  • June 3, 2015
    Distraction dominated teen driver accident causes.
    As a new report shows that distracted driving is a bigger cause of accidents than previously thought, Jon Masters asks what should be done to counter this problem. Research carried out by the AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety has shed new light on the dangers of distraction for teen drivers. Six years of study using video analysis has shown that 58% of all crashes involving teen drivers are caused by the driver being distracted and proved that the influence of external factors is stronger than previously th