Skip to main content

Cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras in US cities and towns

American Traffic Solutions (ATS) has commissioned a cost-benefit analysis the results of which it claims show the direct economic savings to communities that result from using red-light safety cameras at dangerous intersections. The analysis was carried out by John Dunham and Associates, an economic research firm specialising in economic and fiscal impact studies.
July 18, 2012 Read time: 3 mins
17 American Traffic Solutions (ATS) has commissioned a cost-benefit analysis the results of which it claims show the direct economic savings to communities that result from using red-light safety cameras at dangerous intersections. The analysis was carried out by John Dunham and Associates, an economic research firm specialising in economic and fiscal impact studies.

The savings are realised by the decrease in crashes and the ability to redeploy police officers from monitoring dangerous intersections to other crime-fighting efforts.

The study applied a conservative approach, using only the most basic factors for costs and savings. The researchers calculated the estimated cost savings to a community from the deployment of one red-light safety camera at one busy intersection in 25,000 cities and towns in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. To direct attention on the savings realised from reduced crash numbers, revenues resulting from citations paid by red-light runners were not factored into the study’s calculations.

City-specific savings, along with a detailed explanation of the methodology used, %$Linker: External 0 0 0 oLinkExternal can be reviewed here www.atsol.com/economicbenefit false http://www.atsol.com/economicbenefit false false%>. Calculations were estimated over a five-year period.

According to John Dunham and Associates, whose researchers conducted the analysis, a reduction in the number of traffic crashes translates into a direct savings for the community. Red-light safety cameras help reduce crashes, as documented by multiple studies cited in Dunham’s analysis. By reducing crashes, the cameras contribute an economic benefit to the community.

“The measurable costs of crashes, which have been calculated by the 324 US Department of Transportation, are immense and impact everyone. These costs include medical, emergency services, property damage, lost productivity, the monetised value of pain and suffering, lost quality of life, travel delays, insurance administration and legal and court costs,” said John Dunham, managing partner of the firm.

The savings varied from city to city due to the variety of factors that were included in the methodology. For instance, the analysis shows a savings in Hazelwood, Missouri, of $163,036 from one red-light safety camera in the first year of operation and a cumulative savings of $728,952 over five years. In St. Petersburg, Florida, the savings in the first year is $187,440 and $846,849 over five years. In Linden, New Jersey, the savings are $289,184 in the first year and more than $1.3 million over five years.

“It’s indisputable that there is a cost associated with automobile crashes,” said James Tuton, president and CEO of ATS. “This study finally provides us with the measurable economic benefits a city can realise by using even one red-light safety camera to decrease crashes in their community. However, the greatest benefit any community can achieve through road safety camera programmes is saving people’s lives.”

Related Content

  • November 28, 2012
    Canadian authorities convinced of enforcement safety benefits
    Cost-benefit analysis invariably finds highly in favour of speed and red light enforcement, particularly so in Edmonton in the Alberta province of Canada, where authorities need no convincing of the merits of road safety engineering. Justification of enforcement efforts on economic grounds has been reinforced this year, by a study of the costs and benefits of red light enforcement. New York-based economic research firm John Dunham & Associates carried out this latest analysis for American Traffic Solutions
  • January 3, 2017
    ATS wants drivers to stop running red lights
    US traffic safety camera provider American Traffic Solutions (ATS) has compiled a video (link https://www.atsol.com/2016-worst-red-light-runners/) from its red light cameras in operation in the US and wants drivers to see the collection of red-light running crash videos which it says are too dangerous to ignore. According to independent research, red light cameras have a measurable impact on traffic safety; in 2016, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety determined red-light cameras in 79 large US ci
  • March 15, 2012
    Barcelona finds speed cameras save money and lives
    Deploying speed cameras in urban areas saves vast amounts of money as well as lives, according to a two-year cost benefit analysis carried out in Barcelona, Spain. Barcelona, with an extensive urban area, is typical of many cities in the developed world. There are over 10,000 motor vehicle accidents annually with more than 12,000 people injured every year and less than 50 deaths. Economically, the cost of traffic accidents in Barcelona is over €300M a year.
  • November 5, 2012
    St Louis red light cameras changing driver behaviour
    According to a new analysis of the City of St. Louis' violator-funded red-light safety camera program carried out by safety camera supplier American Traffic Systems (ATS), drivers are adopting safer driving habits by stopping at red lights. As drivers comply with the law, the risk of dangerous red-light running collisions is reduced, and streets become safer for drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. The study reviewed nearly 350,000 red-light running violations issued in the city from the time the program bega