Skip to main content

CARS group forms to protect rider privacy

A group has formed to raise awareness of how mobility data specification (MDS) can be used by local governments to track personal movements through a city.
By Ben Spencer March 23, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
CARS sets out to raise awareness of MDS (© Odu Van | Dreamstime.com)

The Communities Against Rider Surveillance (CARS) says MDS is a data language that allows cities and vehicles to communicate in real time via an application programming interface (API) that sends details to cities about the start, end and route of each vehicle trip. A second API requires real-time pushing of precise rider locations to cities.

The coalition is calling on cities to reject MDS tracking programmes and adopt data collection policies that protect rider privacy and safety.

CARS spokesperson Keeley Christensen, says: “Imagine your personal movements being tracked by the government. Every time you visit the doctor, have a date or go to the gym, a government record would be created. Thanks to MDS, this scenario could soon become a reality. It’s not surprising that city planners have cut the public entirely out of the MDS conversation, but we hope that CARS will finally give them a voice.”

According to CARS, using MDS requires vehicles to transmit their precise location to cities which can then send instructions back to drivers – re-routing cars, limiting street access and imposing fines.

MDS does not collect the names of riders, but a Los Angeles Times report suggests that “someone with basic coding skills and access to the data could easily connect a trip to an individual person”.
This means MDS can be used to identify and reveal sensitive location information on riders such as business meetings, personal appointments and political activities, CARS adds.

The group recognises that while US cities are fighting hacking attempts and internal abuses of confidential data, but most have “failed to specify their policies and practices for handling MDS location data, let alone adopted clear privacy safeguards before implementing these tracking programmes”.

The Los Angeles Department of Transportation created MDS in 2018 to track and direct the movement of individual vehicles, ranging from dockless scooters and bikes to ride-hailing, commercial vehicles, autonomous cars, and drones.

Members of CARS include Uber, Patient Privacy Rights and a national civic engagement group dedicated to Latino and migrant communities called Mi Familia Vota.

 

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • When caring about sharing is good business for US automakers
    October 28, 2015
    Although car-sharing and ride-sharing could drastically reduce car sales, David Crawford finds some US automakers are keen to participate in the sharing economy. Growing consumer interest in car- and ride-sharing, as opposed to outright ownership, and ride-sharer Uber’s recently stated intention to make its brand competitive with ownership on cost, are making the major US automotive manufacturers think seriously about their future sales prospects. Some have already begun exploring ways of entering the field
  • Securing V2X communications
    June 6, 2016
    Cybersecurity developments are moving fast in the automotive sector, but they’re a significant hurdle for the roll-out of C-ITS applications. Jon Masters reports. In the wake of the high-profile hacking of the Jeep Cherokee and problems like the flaw in the Nissan Leaf’s companion app that could compromise the security of data about recent journeys, initiatives linked to vehicle cybersecurity seem to be moving rapidly.
  • Leading Finland’s transport revolution
    July 18, 2017
    Anne Berner, Finland’s minister of transport and communications, does not fit the normal political mould. She is not a career politician but a business executive who became a member of parliament in 2015 and has said from the outset that she will only serve one term. Without concerns about being re-elected and a clear view of the future of transport, Berner can concentrate on what needs to be done - tackling some of the more contentious and intransigent subjects. Her name is best known for two major initiat
  • Assessing the potential of in-vehicle enforcement systems
    December 4, 2012
    Jason Barnes considers the social and ethical ramifications of using in-vehicle safety technologies to fulfil enforcement functions. Although policy documents often imply close correlation between enforcement, compliance and safety – in part, as a counter to accusations that enforcement is rather more concerned with revenue generation – there is a noticeable reluctance among policy makers and auto manufacturers to exploit in-vehicle safety systems for enforcement applications. From a technical perspective t