Skip to main content

CARS group forms to protect rider privacy

A group has formed to raise awareness of how mobility data specification (MDS) can be used by local governments to track personal movements through a city.
By Ben Spencer March 23, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
CARS sets out to raise awareness of MDS (© Odu Van | Dreamstime.com)

The Communities Against Rider Surveillance (CARS) says MDS is a data language that allows cities and vehicles to communicate in real time via an application programming interface (API) that sends details to cities about the start, end and route of each vehicle trip. A second API requires real-time pushing of precise rider locations to cities.

The coalition is calling on cities to reject MDS tracking programmes and adopt data collection policies that protect rider privacy and safety.

CARS spokesperson Keeley Christensen, says: “Imagine your personal movements being tracked by the government. Every time you visit the doctor, have a date or go to the gym, a government record would be created. Thanks to MDS, this scenario could soon become a reality. It’s not surprising that city planners have cut the public entirely out of the MDS conversation, but we hope that CARS will finally give them a voice.”

According to CARS, using MDS requires vehicles to transmit their precise location to cities which can then send instructions back to drivers – re-routing cars, limiting street access and imposing fines.

MDS does not collect the names of riders, but a Los Angeles Times report suggests that “someone with basic coding skills and access to the data could easily connect a trip to an individual person”.
This means MDS can be used to identify and reveal sensitive location information on riders such as business meetings, personal appointments and political activities, CARS adds.

The group recognises that while US cities are fighting hacking attempts and internal abuses of confidential data, but most have “failed to specify their policies and practices for handling MDS location data, let alone adopted clear privacy safeguards before implementing these tracking programmes”.

The Los Angeles Department of Transportation created MDS in 2018 to track and direct the movement of individual vehicles, ranging from dockless scooters and bikes to ride-hailing, commercial vehicles, autonomous cars, and drones.

Members of CARS include Uber, Patient Privacy Rights and a national civic engagement group dedicated to Latino and migrant communities called Mi Familia Vota.

 

 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Florida’s Altamonte Springs uses Uber pilot program with Uber to expand transportation coverage
    April 5, 2017
    To Uber or Not to Uber, that is the question cities must answer as they consider the pros and cons of inviting private transportation service providers to fill transportation gaps. Back in 1999, Frank Martz, city manager of Altamonte Springs, Florida, had an idea to expand transportation services to areas not covered by the local bus company.
  • Bigger role for data protection and privacy policies in transportation
    June 11, 2015
    Dr Caitlin Cottrill, lecturer at the University of Aberdeen’s School of Geosciences, examines the impact of privacy legislation on the transportation sector. Growing reliance on big data, underscored by the increasing ubiquity of smart infrastructure and the ‘Internet of Things’, has profoundly impacted the regulatory environment experienced by transportation professionals. This is particularly the case in relation to the privacy of personally identifying information (PII). There has been increased attenti
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 1, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become. ITS Stockholm in 2009 and the Cooperative Mobility Showcase event which took place alongside Intertraffic in Amsterdam in March this year both featured live, on-street demonstrations of safety and driver information applications that used Vehicle-to-Infrastructure (V2I) and Vehicle-to-Vehicle (V2V) communications,
  • Cooperative systems and privacy not mutually exclusive
    February 6, 2012
    Are co-operative systems and personal privacy mutually exclusive? Not necessarily, says Neil Hoose. But the more advanced the application, the greater the concession of privacy may have to become