Skip to main content

Bedfordshire police speed camera proposals ‘unhelpful’

A UK enforcement expert and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding. Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more c
November 9, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
A UK enforcement expert and the 6187 Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding.

Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more cuts. Strict enforcement of the speed limit could raise £1m and to me that’s better than losing 25 more police officers.”

To help with funding, he proposes permanently switching on the speed cameras on one of the busiest stretches of the M1 between junction 10 and 13. The cameras are usually only in operation when speed restrictions are in place.

Geoff Collins, sales and marketing director of 604 Vysionics, said, “It is unhelpful to encourage the belief in a link between speed enforcement cameras and revenue generation.  Drivers’ compliance is earned through the appropriate use of camera technology, typically through casualty reduction and improving traffic flows, rather than raising money.”

Neil Greig, IAM director of policy and research, commented, “Comments like this don’t help the image of safety cameras because it reinforces the myth that they are just for raising money, not road safety.

It also highlights the inconsistencies between the different English police forces in the way they are using smart motorway enforcement technology which undermines  their  benefits and public confidence.”

Downing Street has warned that speed cameras should be about safety, not a revenue generator. Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokeswoman said: "We are very clear that speed cameras should be about safety, not about raising cash.

"The point we would make to those thinking about using them for other means is that it is important to note that revenue generated from speeding offences doesn't go to police forces, it goes to a central fund."

Money from speed camera fines goes to the consolidated fund - the Government's bank account at the Bank of England - for general expenditure. It can then be distributed by the 1837 Department for Transport through grants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • The red light camera choice: 60 killed or save US$231 million a year
    June 5, 2015
    David Crawford investigates new cost-benefit analysis of red light cameras. US states can now realistically calculate the economic benefits of using red light safety cameras, alone or in combination with other measures, to cut road traffic accident levels. The results could be of material value in making the case for the cameras as a number of state legislatures continue to debate their acceptability.
  • Highways England highlights enforcement business
    April 16, 2019
    Enforcement policies need to start focusing much harder on business users, says a new initiative from Highways England. Geoff Hadwick reports on what this could mean for cutting work-related injuries and incidents
  • Scotland pledges 'no road deaths by 2050'
    March 5, 2021
    Scottish Government's Road Safety Framework unveils interim safety targets to 2030
  • US adopts automated enforcement… gradually
    March 4, 2014
    The US automated enforcement market is in rude health as the number of systems and applications continues to grow and broaden. Jason Barnes reports. Blessed and cursed – arguably, in equal measure – with a constitution which stresses the right to self-expression and determination, the US has had a harder journey than most to the more widespread use of automated traffic enforcement systems. In some cases, opposition to the concept has been extreme – including the murder of a roadside civil enforcement offici