Skip to main content

Bedfordshire police speed camera proposals ‘unhelpful’

A UK enforcement expert and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding. Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more c
November 9, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
A UK enforcement expert and the 6187 Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding.

Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more cuts. Strict enforcement of the speed limit could raise £1m and to me that’s better than losing 25 more police officers.”

To help with funding, he proposes permanently switching on the speed cameras on one of the busiest stretches of the M1 between junction 10 and 13. The cameras are usually only in operation when speed restrictions are in place.

Geoff Collins, sales and marketing director of 604 Vysionics, said, “It is unhelpful to encourage the belief in a link between speed enforcement cameras and revenue generation.  Drivers’ compliance is earned through the appropriate use of camera technology, typically through casualty reduction and improving traffic flows, rather than raising money.”

Neil Greig, IAM director of policy and research, commented, “Comments like this don’t help the image of safety cameras because it reinforces the myth that they are just for raising money, not road safety.

It also highlights the inconsistencies between the different English police forces in the way they are using smart motorway enforcement technology which undermines  their  benefits and public confidence.”

Downing Street has warned that speed cameras should be about safety, not a revenue generator. Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokeswoman said: "We are very clear that speed cameras should be about safety, not about raising cash.

"The point we would make to those thinking about using them for other means is that it is important to note that revenue generated from speeding offences doesn't go to police forces, it goes to a central fund."

Money from speed camera fines goes to the consolidated fund - the Government's bank account at the Bank of England - for general expenditure. It can then be distributed by the 1837 Department for Transport through grants.

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • Electronic vehicle registration ensures payment
    February 2, 2012
    Like most countries, Bermuda recognised that it was losing revenue through non-compliance with vehicle registration regulations and was equally concerned about vehicles that were not properly insured or put through annual inspections. Indeed, the tiny island state, with a population of around 65,000 people and some 30,000 vehicles, estimated it was losing more than US$1.4 million per year in tax-based revenue since approximately 8 per cent of vehicle owners were cheating the system.
  • Australia's ground breaking average speed enforcement
    February 1, 2012
    The speed enforcement system on the Hume Highway in Australia combines both spot and point-to-point solutions. Here, Redflex's Peter Whyte discusses its implementation. The Australian State of Victoria has achieved notable success in reducing casualty rates since launching a three-pronged road accident prevention initiative in the late-1980s.
  • Enforcement needs automation and communication
    February 1, 2012
    TISPOL's Peter van de Beek questions whether the thought processes which drive enforcement technology development are always the right ones. Peter van de Beek sees an ever-greater role for technology in traffic enforcement but is concerned that the emphasis of technological development and discussion is not always in the right places. 'Old-fashioned' face-to-face policing remains as valid as it ever did, he feels, but adds that there should be greater communication with those engaged at the sharp end of saf
  • UK Spending Review ‘increases capital investment in transport by 50%’
    November 26, 2015
    UK Chancellor George Osborne announced major investments in transport in the government’s Spending Review and Autumn Statement, despite a 37 per cent cut in the Department for Transport’s (DfT) operational budget. This was offset with a planned 50% per cent increase in capital expenditure for the DfT - rising to a total of US$92 billion. In addition to protecting overall police spending in line with inflation, an increase of US$1.3 billion by 2019-20, the review includes US$70 billion capital investment