Skip to main content

Bedfordshire police speed camera proposals ‘unhelpful’

A UK enforcement expert and the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding. Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more c
November 9, 2015 Read time: 3 mins
A UK enforcement expert and the 6187 Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) have branded as ‘unhelpful’ the proposal by Olly Martins, Police Commissioner for Bedfordshire to use money from speed camera fines to fill a shortfall in police funding.

Martins told the Home Affairs Select Committee that the force was ‘stretched to the limit’ and said, "We’ve extensively lobbied the Home Office for fair funding but they haven’t listened and the Chancellor's spending review at the end of the month means we face more cuts. Strict enforcement of the speed limit could raise £1m and to me that’s better than losing 25 more police officers.”

To help with funding, he proposes permanently switching on the speed cameras on one of the busiest stretches of the M1 between junction 10 and 13. The cameras are usually only in operation when speed restrictions are in place.

Geoff Collins, sales and marketing director of 604 Vysionics, said, “It is unhelpful to encourage the belief in a link between speed enforcement cameras and revenue generation.  Drivers’ compliance is earned through the appropriate use of camera technology, typically through casualty reduction and improving traffic flows, rather than raising money.”

Neil Greig, IAM director of policy and research, commented, “Comments like this don’t help the image of safety cameras because it reinforces the myth that they are just for raising money, not road safety.

It also highlights the inconsistencies between the different English police forces in the way they are using smart motorway enforcement technology which undermines  their  benefits and public confidence.”

Downing Street has warned that speed cameras should be about safety, not a revenue generator. Prime Minister David Cameron's official spokeswoman said: "We are very clear that speed cameras should be about safety, not about raising cash.

"The point we would make to those thinking about using them for other means is that it is important to note that revenue generated from speeding offences doesn't go to police forces, it goes to a central fund."

Money from speed camera fines goes to the consolidated fund - the Government's bank account at the Bank of England - for general expenditure. It can then be distributed by the 1837 Department for Transport through grants.

Related Content

  • July 19, 2012
    An honest relationship
    Consider this: "the most important reform should be that of speed limits and the criteria by which they are set". And this: "a successful road safety solution reduces casualties and catches few people because offence rates are so low". Both statements come from the article on pages 28-30 of this issue on business models for automated enforcement. Both come from established figures in the field (respectively, Paolo Sodi of Sodi Scientifica and Geoff Collins of Speed Check Services); and both highlight the ya
  • February 2, 2012
    Need for balance on UK speed enforcement funding cuts
    Trevor Ellis, Chairman of the ITS UK Enforcement Interest Group, considers the implications of the UK Government's decision to withdraw funding for road safety camera partnerships
  • April 10, 2015
    Potholes and road safety a bigger priority for future government, says survey
    The next government must make road safety a top priority, with more than 50 per cent of motorists believing the current administration had not made the issue enough of a concern, according to a survey conducted by the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM). A total of 2,156 people took part in the IAM survey throughout March 2015. The number one gripe amongst those who answered the poll said reducing the number of potholes should be the government’s number one action point, with 70 per cent of respondents
  • March 1, 2022
    Camera catches nearly 700 dangerous drivers 
    Jenoptik camera in Cornwall, England, does not require 'tiger teeth' road markings