Skip to main content

Banks' statement aims to cut road deaths

Pledge from world's bankers aimed at reducing the 1.25 million lives lost on roads each year
By Mike Woof November 23, 2020 Read time: 2 mins
Multilateral development banks commit to boosting road safety (© Mike Woof)

A series of agreements will help boost road safety around the world.

Eight multilateral development banks (MDBs) are making a joint commitment to boost global road safety. 

This move is desperately needed as road crashes claim almost 1.25 million lives per year and are considered to be a rapidly-growing public health hazard.

The statement was signed by the African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank, the Development Bank of Latin America,  the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, the European Investment Bank, the Inter-American Development Bank, the Islamic Development Bank and the World Bank.

This confirms the MDBs’ commitment to implementing their 2020 Road Safety Declaration. 

It acknowledges the importance of road safety targets as part of the sustainable development objectives of each multilateral institution and contributes to targets set by the United Nations Decade of Action for Road Safety. 

The 2020 declaration by MDBs builds on the results of the 3rd Global Ministerial Conference on Road Safety 2011-2020, which took place in February 2020 in Stockholm and was attended by 1,700 high-level delegates from 140 countries. 

The event helped raise awareness of road safety and called for a new global push to reduce road traffic-related deaths and injuries by 50% by 2030. 

“As responsible investors we are taking road safety issues seriously and are committed to contributing to significant improvements,” said Nandita Parshad, EBRD managing director, Sustainable Infrastructure Group.

“The EBRD’s activities to date include road safety audits conducted in 12 countries, local awareness campaigns across our regions and close cooperation with the road agencies of Serbia and Ukraine, which have adopted international road safety management systems.”

“For the private sector, we have developed an occupational road risk toolkit and e-learning programme, among other measures. We believe that joint action with our fellow MDBs is the right way forward and today’s statement is an important milestone in this process.”

The EBRD acknowledges the increasing role that MDBs will play in the development of the low-carbon sustainable infrastructure necessary for global recovery after the Covid-19 pandemic. 

The Bank will continue to integrate road safety improvements into its investment projects, both through transactions related to the upgrading of roads and through raising awareness of road safety in project design.
 

For more information on companies in this article

Related Content

  • US transit agencies to receive $30bn
    March 1, 2021
    California Transit Association praises passing of $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act
  • Multi-modal transport system key to liveable city development
    June 20, 2012
    Malaysia’s Economic Transformation Programme aims to transform Kuala Lumpur into one of the world’s most liveable cities. Mohd Nur Kamal, CEO of SPAD, Malaysia’s Land Transport Commission, explains how a world class multi-modal transport system will be key to reaching that goal Superficially, Kuala Lumpur, or KL as it is commonly known, is the model of a vibrant, modern, cosmopolitan city to equal any in the world. The Petronas Twin Towers, an iconic global symbol of Malaysia, are surrounded by stunningly
  • Treepz expands presence in East Africa 
    December 6, 2021
    Canadian mobility firm aims to build largest shared mobility platform in sub-Saharan Africa
  • Road pricing is inevitable – because the ‘user pays’ principle is fair
    June 14, 2018
    We pay for roads through our taxes: the poor pay proportionately more, and effectively subsidise the rich. It would be fairer to accept the ‘user pays’ principle, says Dr John Walker. Road pricing is already used worldwide to combat congestion and pollution, to compensate for falling revenues from fuel duty (‘gas tax’), to provide an alternative (and fairer) means of charging motorists than the 80-year old fuel tax and to improve the efficiency of and expand transport infrastructure. However, it could and s