Skip to main content

Walk! California decriminalises jaywalking

It's been illegal for a century, but soon pedestrians in the US state will cross where they like
By Adam Hill October 13, 2022 Read time: 2 mins
From 1 January 2023, you won't need necessarily to cross here in Los Angeles (© ITS International)

Jaywalking - the act of crossing the road when not at a marked crosswalk or signalised intersection - is to be decriminalised in California, as long as pedestrians are adjudged to have done it safely.

From 1 January, pedestrians in the US state will be able to cross the street wherever they like.

The Freedom To Walk Act from California Assembly member Phil Ting (D-San Francisco) defines when an officer can stop and cite a pedestrian for jaywalking: they will only be able to do so "when a reasonably careful person would realise there is an immediate danger of a collision".

Opponents of jaywalking laws have long argued that they are used by law enforcement authorities as a pretext to harass individuals, particularly those from low-income communities or from ethnic minorities.

“It should not be a criminal offence to safely cross the street," said Ting. "When expensive tickets and unnecessary confrontations with police impact only certain communities, it’s time to reconsider how we use our law enforcement resources and whether our jaywalking laws really do protect pedestrians."

“Plus, we should be encouraging people to get out of their cars and walk for health and environmental reasons.”

Peter Norton, in his book Autonorama, makes the point that legislation to outlaw 'jaywalking' - in itself a derogatory term, since 'jay' means 'country bumpkin' - was encouraged by the nascent US auto industry in the early 20th century to switch blame for road deaths from car drivers to vulnerable road users.

Related Content

  • Legalities of in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures
    February 1, 2012
    Paul Laurenza of Dykema Gossett PLLC discusses the paths which lawmakers may go down on the route to making in-vehicle systems and cooperative infrastructures a reality. The question of whether or not to mandate in-vehicle systems for safety and other applications is a vexed one. There is a presumption on some parts that going down the road of forcing systems' fitment is somehow too domineering or restricting. Others would argue that it is the only realistic way of ensuring that systems achieve widespread d
  • IBTTA: road user charge is the future
    March 16, 2022
    The US government’s cash injection for the nation’s bridges represents a step forward – but IBTTA’s Pat Jones suggests that states need to consider the benefits of road usage charging
  • OpenSpace visualises how social distancing will work
    May 26, 2020
    OpenSpace CEO Nicolas Le Glatin tells Adam Hill how Xovis camera tech might help unlock more convenient ways for moving through mobility hubs during Covid-19
  • Most pedestrian detection systems ‘hit pedestrians at 30mph’
    October 14, 2019
    In-car automatic emergency braking systems with pedestrian detection mostly fail to avoid hitting pedestrians - and are “completely ineffective at night”, according to new research. In shocking findings, the American Automobile Association (AAA) revealed that most systems hit a simulated pedestrian target at 30mph. A collision also occurred 89% of the time when a vehicle operating at 20mph encountered a child darting between two cars. In tests, all vehicles collided with an adult pedestrian immediately fo